Class surprises lesbian teacher on wedding day , page 12
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14    15  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 04:44 AM by msnevil
reply to post by moocowman


Underwear clad lesbians scare children,
please think about the children.

But attacking the moderator's wife, just because you liked the pictures? why?



reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 04:51 AM by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by moocowman


Well most of the moderators posting in here have been voicing pretty strongly their support for this wedding, and gay tolerance and acceptance in general. So chances are it's one of those moderators that took that pic out. I really do not know. I am just giving the benefit of the doubt here.

Still, I think it would have been taken out if it were a man and a women in underwear in that same embrace. As I think it's against the policies here. Hey, maybe I am giving too much credit, I don't know. I just know I have seen some pretty awesome posts from the moderators in this particular thread


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 05:01 AM by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by blueorder


Honestly, are you even open for discussion with me?

Honestly, in your head do you not think of me as a "scum" and a "liberal"? I mean I just said I supported this wedding. And so did they. So I guess I am scum that is supporting a liberal agenda.

Please, let me know I am wrong about this and you are actually open-minded and considerate enough to have a real conversation


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 05:57 AM by moocowman
Originally posted by msnevil
reply to post by moocowman


Underwear clad lesbians scare children,
please think about the children.

But attacking the moderator's wife, just because you liked the pictures? why?

My intention was not to attack anybodies wife, I'm just trying to understand why a man would find a woman in her underwear offencive.

Does the same man find a woman in a bikini offencive?
Does this man have a hard time driving past a beach or turn off the TV when a deoderant advert comes on?

How would this man feel if his wife, girlfriend, sister or mums' photo was removed from let't say a highschool because it was deemed it was offencive?


What exactly offends the mods, is it the fmale or the underware or the combination of both ?

If for example this particular individual is married, does he make his wife dress in a closet because the sight of her in underware offends him?

Does his wife have to go swimming fully clothed ?

If I were to post a pic of baywatch with 2 females in it, would the mods consider this offencive allthough it is aired on TV and clearly not offencive to the majoirity of people?

Are one or more female Olympic swimmers equally as offencive when they emrace ?


Interestingly "underwear clad lesbians" do not frighten my children (a boy and girl) ie women in underware certainly don't frighten my children, and neither do women in an embrace.

Funnily enough my children don't see 2 lesbians they see 2 women or people, it is narrow minded ignorant adults that require a label.


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 07:46 AM by moocowman
reply to post by blueorder


Sorry didn't explain myself very well,

If it were not for EU Human rights, then the (so called ) marriage of same sex partners would not be legal.

I had previously no right to be married to a person of the same sex and obviously my child could not attend this no event because of bigotry, which has now been addressed.

Your point on sharia law is thought provoking and valid, in that it would appear (on the face of it) that should this be applicable, it would on the face of deny the human rights that have recently been introduced.

As the madness unfolds around us -----


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 07:48 AM by blueorder
Originally posted by moocowman
reply to post by blueorder


Sorry didn't explain myself very well,

If it were not for EU Human rights, then the (so called ) marriage of same sex partners would not be legal.

I had previously no right to be married to a person of the same sex and obviously my child could not attend this no event because of bigotry, which has now been addressed.

Your point on sharia law is thought provoking and valid, in that it would appear (on the face of it) that should this be applicable, it would on the face of deny the human rights that have recently been introduced.

As the madness unfolds around us -----




thanks for clarifying, I think, are you pro or anti gay weddings, I couldnt really work it out


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 10:11 AM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by Clearskies
Originally posted by Amaterasu

And that's a problem because...?


Because girls are confused and don't trust guys anymore!
Vice-versa. I have seen LOTS of girls molested by men who turn to each other for love.
Not many women molest compared to men, but, I think boys have the same effect, (ironically) sometimes when molested by men.
Either it's being scared off the opposite sex or adoration for themselves and those like them.
Either way IT DOESN'T help the bridges between males and females!


Ok here is your original statement:

People even wonder why there is SO MUCH more experimentation in homosexuality and bi-sexuality? Because it's been mainstreamed.


And I asked why that was a problem, that homosexuality had been mainstreamed. What you answered was not a reflection of why it is a problem that homosexuality had been mainstreamed. It seemed more an answer to why it is a problem that girls are passing around one like a toy.

Perhaps you can answer the question I asked.

Maybe, you're young and you don't remember America BEFORE the effects of the 'sexual revolution'


I'm 51. Nearly 52. (I still consider myself young, though.)

But I have seen the sexual revolution, and have not thought there is a problem with it. What "effects" are you referring to?

Here ya go:
www.libertythink.com...


I knew SOME of that, but, I didn't remember the part about them going to the grove.
They WILL have JUSTICE! All those who have been abused and killed and no one knew where they went.
Those evil demon-filled, child predators who scoff at God, while worshipping themselves and money, dabbling in the occult, and killing children WILL PAY.
There is One Who Judges, Johovah God!


Well, it's fine that you believe that. It's not in my belief system. In mine, we humans should be doing something about this.

But the point was that Bush Senior IS involved in child predation and abuse.

And Bohemian Grove is a tip on a very large and ugly iceberg.
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14    15  >>    ^^TOP^^



Poland Beekeepers Win Ban on Monsanto\'s GMO!
  Posted 12 days ago with 74 member flags
Girl, 16, Kills Herself After Researching 2012 Doomsday Threads...
  Posted 9 days ago with 49 member flags
AP IMPACT: Evacs and drills pared near nuke plants
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
Plane Crash!
  Posted 18 days ago with 27 member flags