It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...God founded a church, and this church he gave the ability to loose and bind sins and things on Earth (like hollidays), and the fact is that it existed long before the protestant translations were even a thought, and it produced 100s of saints and will contin ue to do so just like it does with communion...
Where do you find that? From another council?
...like the immaculate conception and so forth, and councils.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
I agree with that. The highly structured and codified version we are handed, has to be not accepted at its face value, and it is up to the individual to struggle through their own understanding of the relationship of Jesus with the One he calls his Father.
Right! Anything we think about how God should be, will not change how God really is. My point is that if you have several different religious organizations, each offering their own version of the God nature, why should we blindly accept any of them? Why could we not read the Bible and come up with a version of our own that would be just as legitimate? Especially considering that at lest one of those versions (the "official" version) came out of a pagan dominated culture and was surrounded by controversy, not excluding power politics.
Originally posted by miriam0566
its not up to the individual at all. god's nature is the way it is whether we have a different theory on it or not. if god's word is in fact god's word, he is very clear about his nature. this is the point that trinitarians ignore.
look at the big picture for a second, they take 2 scriptures (1john doesnt count because its been altered) that COULD be interpreted as jesus and god being one person, then they ignore an army of scriptures that blatantly and in no uncertain terms say they are different.
logical fallacy?
Originally posted by JesusisTruth
The trintiy exist and is biblical, and further more it's literally implanted on our Torsos. The heart is on the left, Jesus sits at Gods right hand, the right side of the chest represents jesus. The belly button represents the holy Ghost which scripture says dwells in the body area. Those three points have much more meaning then you can imagine and God is revealing this at this time in history.
Now Psalms 109:1
" The Lord said to my (Lord) sit thou at my right hand "
So it was God speaking with the second person of God which is Christ, and notice he keeps saying right hand. That's the mystery he's talking about.
The heart is the left side of the chest.
Psalms 79:18
" Sit thou at my right hand "
Ok scripture says jesus is the messiah, God in the flesh. That spirit of truth talked about in John is the holy ghost.
how it works I don't know but I do believe in it.
peace.
First of all you have to atleast try and understand what God is here and stop
Originally posted by JesusisTruth
( No Miraim, what they did is put their hollidays as the bible talks about not letting people judge you of, this is why he gave them the power to lose and bind on Earth kid.
firstly they are trying to devert attention to those pagan hollidays with the (christian) ones they created to serve Christ.
( firslty I can sense your arrogance here, but that's another thing in your soul you will come to deal with later. Now the reason he was praying was because he came as a servant and wanted to testify to us that.
as we see in Phillipians 2: It says he came as a sevrant but was (equal) to God.
and why didn't you include after that it says, and that same word was made flesh and dwelt among us?
If the word was a God and God what's the difference? It was made flesh, and further more prophets are not made flesh and dwell among us.
Miraim you sound like a Muslim here.
No no girl, God can do because he had a fleshly body which dies. It's called the natural death of the body. ofcourse his spirit can't and he didn't say that did he.
Matthew 11:27 ( all power in heaven given to Jesus)
Matthew 12:8 ( Jesus says he is the Lord of the sabbath)
Jhon 20:28 ( The disciple called christ Lord and God)
John 21:17 ( Jesus knows all things)
Titus 2:13 ( God and saviour)
Phillipians 2:5 ( Jesus taking form of servant but is equal to god)
Romans 9:5 ( Jesus over all things)
John 1:14 ( the word was made flesh) furthermore scripture talks about the messiah (God) in the flesh visiting his people
John 8:58 ( before abraham was made I am)
John 9:37 ( It is I (the messiah) that talketh with thee)
Hebrews 1:4 ( all things are subject to him )
1Thessalonians 3:13 (Christ and his saints)
You see Miram, you are a good hearted woman, but what you fail to realize is that God founded a church,
that scripture is not talking about changing doctrine nor is it talking about adopting pagan holidays. that is false worship, plain and simple. dont agree? read the OT and read about all the times Isreal decided to do their own thing.
and this church he gave the ability to loose and bind sins and things on Earth (like hollidays),
and the fact is that it existed long before the protestant translations were even a thought,
and it produced 100s of saints and will contin ue to do so just like it does with communion,
and what you fail to realize is that Jesus came as a servant and he acted that way, which is why he prayed to God.
He is God in the flesh, and this is implanted on our bodies, and at death when god shows you why our boides are contructed like this you will see what I mean, but until then you can believe what you will.
Originally posted by JesusisTruth
again, no understanding defiles souls, and this is what athiest do, I don't understand why Miraim you would do this.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
Right! Anything we think about how God should be, will not change how God really is. My point is that if you have several different religious organizations, each offering their own version of the God nature, why should we blindly accept any of them? Why could we not read the Bible and come up with a version of our own that would be just as legitimate? Especially considering that at lest one of those versions (the "official" version) came out of a pagan dominated culture and was surrounded by controversy, not excluding power politics.
I do think we need to keep our beliefs consistent with the Bible, otherwise, we have no firm anchor to keep us from drifting into all sorts of errors.
I do not want to wear you down with some non-essential arguments.
First, I need to see if I understand what you are saying: It looks like you are saying that the Bible clearly describes the Nature of God, and that it also describes Jesus' nature as being different from that.
I think you are also saying God and Jesus are separate individuals.
If I correctly understand these as being your points, I would agree with you.
What I was trying to say in my earlier posts is that it is possible to believe in a trinity, without believing in the Trinity. I would use it in the most broad sense of the meaning of the word. It is hard to deny that there are three different things or individuals who belong to their own grouping, and so, could be considered a trinity.
Originally posted by JesusisTruth
God came as a servvant, this is why he was praying to the father. He is a seperate person from God but the same thing. And he never admitted inferiority to god, that's just not true as I already pointed out. It's like you guys can't comprehend right.
Thomas called him Lord and God, he called himself God and the messiah as I pointed out, and he is literally God which the scripture points out.
every single denomination believes this and have since the church began except muslims. So Miraim is no diffferent then a Muslim minded woman.
I cannot wait for you souls at the death bed, when you meet him face to face, he will show you what I'm trying to explain in here and I hope you believe it then.
Originally posted by JesusisTruth
No that's not true. It's a web of lies to you and ofcourse your protestant friends will agree on here with that. God gave the church the ability to loose and bind things on Earth, and this is why we shouldn't have personal interpretation which has led to 3,000 more churches all divided against themself with truth.
so what Miraim makes you interpretation better then theirs? And how is yours difinitevly.
Many saints seen God in his glory and worked countless miracles 300 years before the catholic church put that same bible together you use.
This is the church of Christ, and for you to call it a web of lies, is presumptious at best and truly comes from a motivational standpoint.
You look into the girl on my signatures eyes. This innocent dove who never lied in her life, I read her life story, she had the stigmata, she also worked miracles, but do you think almighty God would allow this innocent soul to live and die in a false religion when her heart only loved him?
and you want to talk about the bible. God gave the hierarchy the power to interpret scriputre and create and loose things on earth. When God said baptise all creatures in the name of.....
why would he even mention baptising in the name of God, and the a prophet Jesus, and some spirit called the holy ghost whom protestants don't even consider being divine?
Why didn't God just say, baptise in the name of God?
and I love you too death too, but I will never renounce my Catholic faith, ever. I know what Ive felt from communion, I know it. i used to be protestant too, and I do believe in the eucharistic miracles which scientists have tested and that just confirms what Ive felt communion do to my soul.
(why?) the bible does not call them a "trinity". the only reason i can see for someone to hold on to that classification is to either a] hold on to pagan beliefs or b] cater to those who hold on to pagan beliefs.
as we see in Phillipians 2: It says he came as a sevrant but was (equal) to God.
in the form of God (the divine essence is not meant: but the external self-manifesting characteristics of God, the form shining forth from His glorious essence). The divine nature had infinite BEAUTY in itself, even without any creature contemplating that beauty: that beauty was 'the form of God'; jfb.biblecommenter.com...