Anyone see the democratic mouthpiece on Fox this morning?, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 09:40 AM by wonkamaniac
Originally posted by Fromabove
Barack Obama wants to "spread the wealth around" and just as Biden put it "take money" from those who work very hard and use their talents and ideas to prosper, and give that money to other people who don't have it.

Source, please, I very seriously doubt that either gentlemen ever said this...

Secondly, Palosi and Reed are in Washington right now planning a tax increase on everyone even as we speak, making Obama's pledge not to raise taxes on Americans earning less that 250K per year worthless.

If that is the case, and I seriously doubt it in a lame duck session... Bush will veto it anyway, making the entire point moot.
I don't know about you, but I don't want Obama to take my money away from me and give it to anyone else. I earned it.

Yes, you did earn it... Did you earn over $250,000 last year? If not, you are quite safe under the Obama tax plan.
Lastly and most importantly, socialism, communism, whatever you call it does not work. Under socialism there is no incentive to succeed, to improve one's standard of living because the government will give you one.

Ahhh... on that point we agree to a degree. Ever use the public library? Socialist! Ever use Fire or Police services? Socialist! Ever attend a public school? Socialist! Does someone pick up your trash every week? Socialist! Socialism is not necessarily a dirty word, sir, depends on how you apply it. When it comes to the free market, I agree. Socialism is a bad thing there, but Regulations and Congressional Oversight are a good thing in the Market, as they tend to keep blind greed in check!
May I suggest that before you pull the lever, or push the button, or scan the card for president, that you ask yourself how much of what you have left do you want them to take away from you. I think the answer is simple, don't vote for the socialist, vote for the tax cutter overall.

I suggest that you look towards your local Senators and Congressmen for that answer. How many of them voted for the bailout? That is what really going to hit you hard in the end. McCain and Obama both voted for this travesty, no choice there. But you do have a choice with your local representatives... Think about it.



reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 10:29 AM by Constitutional Scholar
reply to post by wonkamaniac


You really think it's just that simple dont you?

Very typical of the average American voter.

[edit on 15-10-2008 by Constitutional Scholar]


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 10:41 AM by buddhasystem
Originally posted by jjkenobi
And Biden said it was patriotic to pay more taxes.


For all the anti-tax folks heere,
en.wikipedia.org...

The Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, commonly called the Interstate Highway System (or simply, the Interstate System), is a network of limited-access highways (also called freeways or expressways) in the United States that is named for the President who championed its creation. The Interstate Highway System is a separate system within the larger National Highway System. The entire system, as of 2004
Important Topic Updates
, has a total length of 46,837 miles (75,376 km), making it both the largest highway system in the world and the largest public works project in history.


Do you even doubt that the Interstate System is an engine in the locomotive of the American economy and defense capabilities? Fact is, you take so much for granted while levying this charge against anybody you preceive as a socialist. Your life is moderately comfortable due to a myriad of activities financed by our taxes, and seeing you for the scrooges you are, I doubt that you'd voluntarily part with money to pay for things like Interstate or scientific research. One "Constitutional Scholar" in this board is bragging about his ability to dodge taxes. He doesn't feel any compunction driving on an Interstate the rest of us paid for.


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 10:46 AM by Constitutional Scholar
reply to post by buddhasystem



Uh, the government has Constitutional authorization to use taxpayer money to build post roads.

Ever see those USPS trucks on the interstate?

Of course you have.


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 10:51 AM by Constitutional Scholar
reply to post by buddhasystem



Not quite.

Ever heard of the taxes paid on gas?

I have 4 vehicles. 2 for business, and 2 for personal use.

Chances are great that I pay more in taxes on gasoline (which are used to build roads) than you do.

So get the hell off my road.


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 11:13 AM by Stormdancer777
reply to post by wonkamaniac





Source, please, I very seriously doubt that either gentlemen ever said this...


He said it , seen it reported, the words flowing right out of his mouth and Biden's

minx.cc...

Joe Biden: Be Patriotic Pay Higher Taxes
www.youtube.com...


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 11:18 AM by Stormdancer777
Obama's 95% Illusion

online.wsj.com...



It's a clever pitch, because it lets him pose as a middle-class tax cutter while disguising that he's also proposing one of the largest tax increases ever on the other 5%. But how does he conjure this miracle, especially since more than a third of all Americans already pay no income taxes at all? There are several sleights of hand, but the most creative is to redefine the meaning of "tax cut."


Listen, I am one of the below middle class poor in this country,

[edit on 113131p://bWednesday2008 by Stormdancer777]


reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 11:40 AM by dragonridr
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Obama's 95% Illusion

online.wsj.com...



It's a clever pitch, because it lets him pose as a middle-class tax cutter while disguising that he's also proposing one of the largest tax increases ever on the other 5%. But how does he conjure this miracle, especially since more than a third of all Americans already pay no income taxes at all? There are several sleights of hand, but the most creative is to redefine the meaning of "tax cut."


Listen, I am one of the below middle class poor in this country,

[edit on 113131p://bWednesday2008 by Stormdancer777]


Dont worry more will be joining you soon Both candidates wil end up raising taxes mark my words.



reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 12:00 PM by Stormdancer777
reply to post by dragonridr






Dont worry more will be joining you soon Both candidates wil end up raising taxes mark my words.


No doubt,

but he poor get poorer




reply posted on 15-10-2008 @ 02:20 PM by wonkamaniac
Originally posted by Constitutional Scholar
reply to
post by MorningStar8741



Uh, if you are referring to the income tax, the poor pay none,


True enough, how can someone pay what they don't have? Even the IRS sees this cold, hard fact of life.

and large chunks of the middle class pay little to none.


Hereby showing you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. Actually, the middle class in this country pay the lion's share of the tax burden. Think about it, kind of makes sense, considering they are the largest demographic and are the engine this economy runs on.

The lions share of the tax burden rests on the shoulders of the "wealthy", yet those who pay none reap the rewards.


Wow... what nation are you speaking about. Actually, the tax laws are written in favor of the wealthy. If you make enough money to itemize and save all those receipts, you are allowed to deduct a huge portion of your income. Add to that the fact that the wealthy can actually afford a good CPA to help them with their taxes and find every allowable loophole, and the truly wealthy pay minimal taxes.

Socialism has no place in this nation, regardless of who is proposing it.

The atrocity known as public education is both unconstitutional and a giant money vacuum.


While I agree that the state of our public education system is seriously atrocious at this point, it was not always in the shape it is currently. It is obvious you have no children. Trust me when I tell you, if you did, you would quickly change your mind on this point.
I've said it before, and I will say it again, the constitution specifically provides for the "general welfare". Their job is to keep us safe, provide services such as police, fire, ambulance, trash service, AND education. I love debating you, and I don't mean anything I say here to you as an insult. We disagree on many things, and that is a good thing in this country. America was founded on the principle of compromise.
Here is something very unconstitutional:
The way this country has used the Military to spread its policies around the world is the most unconstitutional thing I can think of. If you will read that precious document, you will find that the Military is specifically to be used for defense purposes only. I know I'm going to get flamed for "not supporting the troops". That is not the case. The best way to support the troops is to use them only when attacked. In this world, we no longer need bases all around the world to protect our "interests". The military-industrial complex (yes, they really do exist) does not want you to know this because, well, it would cut into their profits and take a large measure of their power away. I proudly served my country, and would gladly lay my life on the line if there were an external threat. I would gladly follow Bin Laden to the gates of Hell, if necessary. However, this administration has not bothered to do so. The best way to support the troops is to bring them home to their families and give them the maximum benefits that we as a society can afford. It's not rocket science, just plain common sense.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Virginia House Bill 1160: Nullify the NDAA
  Posted 14 days ago with 10 member flags
pro Israel or aginst them read this asap!
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
The Solution
  Posted 3 days ago with 7 member flags
2010 Hate Crime Statistics
  Posted 13 days ago with 2 member flags
Ron Paul\'s fans are building like legos
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags