Those Damn Satellite Anomalies DEBUNKED!!!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 45 times


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 09:06 AM by atlasastro
reply to post by OzWeatherman


I am soooooooo dissapointed. You have not used one Youtube video as proof. How am I to believe you. Your links are all from reliable, credible, intelligent sources that I have to read, comprehend and learn from. That is just a no-no.
I tried to star you post twice but could'nt do it, I went to Google Earth to find out why but I got lost looking at clouds that resemble Elvis over Memphis.


S&F it people, this is how you present a thread.



reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 09:54 AM by mikesingh
Originally posted by atlasastro
reply to
post by OzWeatherman


I am soooooooo dissapointed. You have not used one Youtube video as proof. How am I to believe you. Your links are all from reliable, credible, intelligent sources that I have to read, comprehend and learn from. That is just a no-no.


Yep! And Oz goes and spoils all the fun!! Damn!


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 11:19 AM by sos37
reply to post by OzWeatherman



Starred and flagged. Another win for research and good old common sense.

Seriously people, if you found yourself buying into this bunk maybe it's time to get some counseling.


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 11:39 AM by eaganthorn
reply to post by OzWeatherman



You've supplied some good and accurate information that does debunk many if not most of the reported anomalies, especially those of Google Earth.

Here is another link to types of orbits to help support you;
marine.rutgers.edu...

Please note that Geosynchronous and Geostationary orbits are basically the same thing.

Also note that public GPS systems use the Near Polar Orbit satellites which basically have at least three satellites in the sky above you at virtually any position on earth and do show up quite brightly in the infrared spectrum as they are essentially beacons.

All that being said, we cannot say with any realistic or absolute certainty that this information debunks all reported anomalies, as there are always exceptions.


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 11:41 AM by TruthTellist
reply to post by OzWeatherman



Thank you OzWeatherman,

Your timing is impeccable. I had worried that the GFL believers would be using these anomalies as proof of their Oct. 14 "lightship" sighting.

This is a most thorough presentation you have laid out for us. It is sort of a preemptive debunking of what I think will be put forth as "proof" of Blossoms Goldmother's predictions - or proof that google Earth is implicit in "the coverup"

Yours was a most worthwhile endeavor, which has yet to bear all it's fruits.


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 02:11 PM by GenRadek
reply to post by The Undertaker



To me it looks like a weather balloon. (yeah I know, its a lame excuse in the world of UFOs, but that is what it looks like.) You can see the balloon and the instrument package just below it.
Whattya think?


By the way, Oz, well done on the thread. If only there were more like you out there that can shed a common sense approach to these things. Star and flagged!

[edit on 10/13/2008 by GenRadek]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^