Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Why a Democrat is needed in office.

page: 4
4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 18 2008 @ 11:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by Douggie
 



But the big politicians have control over everythiing.



I have to disagree with you.

Lobbyist have control over everything and that includes both parties.

No, the lobbiests just throw money at em.




posted on Oct, 18 2008 @ 06:41 PM
link   
reply to post by TheTraveler
 


Well, sorry to break it to you....as Ive been saying the Republicans your mommy and daddy were so fond of havent been in office for decades.
The Neocons are for control, restriction and personal gain.



posted on Oct, 24 2008 @ 03:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by jerico65

Originally posted by Douggie
It is theorized that he start the fire aboard a ship by stoking his engine in hopes of frightening a friend. This caused the death of 167 crew members.


Oh really? And your source is???????

Sorry, gonna have to throw the bullsh*t flag over this one. This has been proven to be BS since day one.

Thanks, but try again.

Source? a Source for a theory?



posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:25 AM
link   
It's really simple... Look at Illinois. They are fully Democrat controlled and has a Governor that they are looking to impeach, the highest deficit ever partly to thank Obama for and when discovered he refused to cut any of his social welfare spending.

The governor, Resko AND Obama are all tied together in that low income housing that they took the money and didn't help the poor.

Look at the states that these candidates were elected in,... well except for Obama.. you really can't count knocking off your opponets on the ballot leaving only your name as a real election. The presidency is his first real election.. can you believe that.

Chicagoans are not happy with Obama.

If a Democrat is voted in the White House then they have full control and there is no balance. Again look at Illinois and ask if that's what you want to happen.

We need a president who will actually veto crappy bills that Pelosi likes to send over. You know.. the kind that have $165 Billion going to ACORN in the first bailout bill... that was rejected!! That's BS and I'm sick of the extra spending. We don't need a president who will just sign away everything passing his desk!





new topics

top topics
 
4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join