|
|
Topic started on 13-10-2008 @ 12:41 AM by beefeater
|
Girl Gets Sex Jab Against Her Will
www.express.co.uk
 Health officials are investigating after a mother complained her 13-year-old diabetic daughter received the Human Papilloma Virus inoculation
against her will at school.
Debbie Jones, 47, even considered police action after discovering daughter, Gail, was injected despite signing an official form refusing consent.
(visit the link for the full news article)
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Breaking Alternative News topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 12:41 AM by beefeater
|
How annoyed would you be if you signed a form saying you don't want this jab but they give it to you anyway.
Medical expert Dr Richard Halvorsen, author of The Truth About Vaccines, yesterday said he has fears over the safety and effectiveness of the new
vaccine.
He said: “The version we are using contains an immune stimulating ingredient – AS04 – with which we have little experience and which may lead to
immune related problems in later life.
There have been many cases of women reacting badly to this vaccine yet its use still been advocated without it been properly tested.
His worries are backed by US drug regulators, who have refused to licence the UK version of the controversial jab, manufactured by drug giant
GlaxoSmithKline, because they believe its safety record has not yet been proven.
in a nutshell from the good ol us government.
he also said
“I would not give it my daughter. This is being rushed in and it will make billions of pounds for drug companies.”
I could not agree with him more.
www.express.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 12:47 AM by asmeone2
|
"Annoyed" is not the word I would have chosen.
Perhaps livid?
What is it that gives these companies the right to think that they can use human children as... meat?
I understand that they just want money... but it's one thing to just shill a guy, another to stoop to the level of injecting a person with a foreign,
possibly dangerous substance they don't want, just to bill them. I don't understand how humans can go that low and still be considered human.
BTW you might want to consider editing the title... i thought this thread was going to be about something totally different.
[edit on 13-10-2008 by asmeone2]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 12:49 AM by justme2
|
I don't have much to add...
Other than how disgusting this is..
I guess I'm showing what country I reside in, when I say - I hope the mother sues these people for all they are worth! And then get a court order to
inject the person that injected her daughter with something even more funky!
[edit on 10/13/2008 by justme2]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 12:55 AM by beefeater
|
reply to post by asmeone2
i would be livid with steam comming out of my ears
this section of the article really gets the steam pumping
Writing on his internet blog, Mr Jones said: "On the day, our 13-year-old daughter, who by the way has type-1 diabetes, was taken aside from the
other girls and told by the doctor that she was the only girl in her year who had handed in a consent form with a cross in the 'No' box. As they
started to talk, and without being asked if she wanted it, the doctor jabbed her."
im trying to find this blog
that type of action is criminal and reminds me of nazis.
edit to add link to Mr Jones blog
tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com...
[edit on 13-10-2008 by beefeater]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:01 AM by Karlhungis
|
reply to post by asmeone2
What is it that gives these companies the right to think that they can use human children as... meat?
Well, to be technical, they only view the children of the middle class and below to be "meat". The wealthy aren't having this forced on them.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:05 AM by Blueracer
|
What exactly is a "sex jab"? That doesn't sound right.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:07 AM by beefeater
|
reply to post by Karlhungis
this is why i fear this is population control in action.
Mr Jones blog brings up some interesting questions.
Why are they jabbing our kids in the schools by anonymous medical teams when our family doctor, who we know and trust, could adminster or at least
oversee the vaccinations?
Why use the schools when the school authorities are completely powerless and cant even tell us when the next jabbing will occur?
"anonymous medical teams" sounds ominous to say the least
"cant even tell us when the next jabbing will occur" who is running this program? why are schools been left out of the loop?
Has anyones child had this jab and seen what goes on 1st hand? I would be very interested.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:07 AM by space cadet
|
reply to post by beefeater
Sorry for the short post, I am only here to find out what the hell a 'sex jab' is. 
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:10 AM by beefeater
|
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:11 AM by maria_stardust
|
reply to post by space cadet
It comes across a little misleading. The "sex jab" is in reference to a shot that allegedly prevents a certain type of cervical cancer in girls and
young women.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:12 AM by space cadet
|
reply to post by beefeater
LMMFAO! That's what she said!!! I seriously thought it was a mispelling, which led me to think it was supposed to say 'sex job' against her will,
still a strange headline or story!
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:16 AM by Mr Headshot
|
Ick
Gives me an all around bad feeling in my stomache.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:34 AM by Lucid Lunacy
|
It's what Stardust said  And I agree it is a misleading thread title, even though it makes sense.
If I was that mom then that would have been my daughters last day at that school.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:38 AM by cacnotcam
|
Originally posted by Blueracer
What exactly is a "sex jab"? That doesn't sound right.
Yeah! I read the title too and was like woah!! Now I get it. I think...The wording is just a bit off, IMO!!
Either way, I would be beyond just angry if this happened to my child!! What right do they think they have??
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:39 AM by Karlhungis
|
reply to post by Lucid Lunacy
I agree. I would be seeking legal damages as well. This type of thing infuriates me.
And yes, "Sex Jab" sounds like a porn or a new position.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 02:00 AM by verylowfrequency
|
I learned a new slang today " Jab" means vaccination and "Sex Jab" means a vaccination for a sexually transmitted disease. Or am I wrong?
I too thought the title was mistake and was supposed to be "SEX JOB", so of course I had to click as it is not a subject I usually see here. Those
people on the other side of my country pronounce Job as Jab and water wataa.
Oh yeah. Being an American if anyone did that to my child - there would be hell to pay - or a big payout from my lawsuit.
[edit on 13-10-2008 by verylowfrequency]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 03:14 AM by C.C.Benjamin
|
Am I the only person here thinking this is a 13year old girl, not famous for their love of needles or injections, was trying to avoid this injection
via causing a fuss?
Kids rarely know what's good for them, and will quite happily do what they can to avoid it.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 03:18 AM by Lucid Lunacy
|
reply to post by C.C.Benjamin
was injected despite signing an official form refusing consent.
Regardless of what was or was not best for her, it was documented with their forms that she was not giving consent.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 04:02 AM by resistor
|
Consent conschment. You still think you have sovereignty over your own body? Silly peons!
As someone with three implants that I know of, all inserted against my will, I can tell you that this has been going on for a very long time.
They’re just starting to do it openly now. At what point will you begin to resist?
BTW beefeater, that’s one seriously phallic avatar you’ve got working there.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
seriously for a moment, its the HPV jab 
