It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by asmeone2
Not to mention I've experienced members of the church in question blatantly trying to influence the voters--such as harassing the people inside who are waiting in line or hanging up posters inside the church telling people to vote one way or the other.
Kansas has one of the strictest laws in the nation against electioneering at the polls, including specific guidelines about what not to wear.
The law bans “wearing, exhibiting or distributing labels, signs, posters, stickers or other materials that clearly identify a candidate in the election or clearly indicate support or opposition to a ballot question.”
Although it’s been state laws since 1974, voting-rights activists say the electioneering law has more significance this year because of an expected increase in first-time voters.
Secretary of State Ron Thornburgh said he believes the law covers partisan apparel such as the elephant logo of the GOP or a “Democrat and Proud” T-shirt. The outlawed items cannot be worn within 250 feet of the door of the polling place.
§ 61.003. ELECTIONEERING AND LOITERING NEAR POLLING PLACE
PROHIBITED. (a) A person commits an offense if, during the voting
period and within 100 feet of an outside door through which a voter
may enter the building in which a polling place is located, the
person:
(1) loiters; or
(2) electioneers for or against any candidate,
measure, or political party.
§ 61.008. UNLAWFULLY INFLUENCING VOTER. (a) A person
commits an offense if the person indicates to a voter in a polling
place by word, sign, or gesture how the person desires the voter to
vote or not vote.
§ 61.010. WEARING NAME TAG OR BADGE IN POLLING PLACE. (a)
Except as provided by Subsection (b), a person may not wear a badge,
insignia, emblem, or other similar communicative device relating to
a candidate, measure, or political party appearing on the ballot,
or to the conduct of the election, in the polling place or within
100 feet of any outside door through which a voter may enter the
building in which the polling place is located.
“Rather than having a religious purpose or effect, the placement of a polling precinct at the Church had the primary effect of facilitating a secular election,” Judge Middlebrooks wrote in Rabinowitz v. Anderson.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by jsobecky
Just because it is against the law doesn't mean that people don't do it.
If people followed the law the government wouldn't have to send employees out to polling stations to make sure interpretors are provided and no one is discriminated against.
Maybe this is an issue that needs to be brought up. The using of churches.
Originally posted by bruxfain
In the eyes of the Government a church is no different than any other community facility.
No law respecting (with regards to) an establishment of Religion. They should really revisit that Amendment. Too many people are coming to this country thinking they know what it means and they do not. This means that the Government does not recognize a Church as anything more than a not-for-profit organization established according to the laws of this nation.
The Government cannot help you to destroy churches. That is not its job.
[edit on 13-10-2008 by bruxfain]
My objection is that churches are not truly public places... they cater to people of only one beleif system, and thus espouse one particular political viewpoint.
Originally posted by asmeone2
My objection is that churches are not truly public places... they cater to people of only one beleif system, and thus espouse one particular political viewpoint.
They are not truly unbiased, in the way that a library or a school or a fiarground would be.