Hadron collider and the zero one zero protocol, page 2

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:30 PM by Teknikal

I've read a lot about the LHC and never once have I seen anything about some one zero one protocol.

The collider is actually a fairly simple machine in theory think of two very long hoses (granted that is a very simplistic view of it but basicly right) I personally can't think of anything else it could be used for.

But I also think the whole thing should be shut down everyone who claims it is safe talks about Hawking Radiation which most likely doesn't exist and even if it does there are still some papers that make very sombre reading.

arxiv.org...

I've still to see that one disputed even by CERN enthusiasts although I'm sure they will just push ahead anyway who cares about safety when there might be a noble prize.

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:32 PM by Qwenn

Originally posted by selfisolated
reply to post by Qwenn

I think your being pretty bloody abstract.
Care to actually tell us what your thinking, so we know what we're meant to be researching for/against?

If you search for my thread on this subject, then you will be more well able to comment on the subject matter, otherwise, you are wasting all of our time in answering your comments.

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:33 PM by boaby_phet

and what lie woudl that be ?

scince you know me so well im sure you can tell me.

oh ye, sorry, i believe in the lie which is FACT and not what some clown coughs up as a conspiricy behing probably the most amazing machine ever built by man.

please, go take your brain for a walk!

he cant even say what zero one zero is ... let alone proove any truth !

i rest my case.,

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:34 PM by redled

Originally posted by Qwenn

Originally posted by selfisolated
reply to post by Qwenn

I think your being pretty bloody abstract.
Care to actually tell us what your thinking, so we know what we're meant to be researching for/against?

If you search for my thread on this subject, then you will be more well able to comment on the subject matter, otherwise, you are wasting all of our time in answering your comments.

Go on mate, give us a link?

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:36 PM by boaby_phet

reply to post by redled

he she cant, as they just invented this whole dumb senario in their head,,

i rest my case part 2

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:38 PM by ian990003100

Anyone know of 0-1-0 or ZOZ signal, please u2u me, please give me 24 hours.....

^^^^ me thinks we have been here before My mum has curly hair and brushes her teeth

I think he may be woof woofing....(barking)

The LHC is a particle accelerator...... Collider guess what things collide

i spent hours researching zero point zero or 0-1-0 and the lhc has nothing NOTHING to do with it.....

I bid you farewell

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:40 PM by redled

reply to post by boaby_phet

I even got off my butt and searched the site. Not a sausage. What kind of lunacy is that. Did (s)he actually think some people were going to go, 'yeah man, radical' like?

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:40 PM by Qwenn

Click here for more information.

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:45 PM by boaby_phet

reply to post by Qwenn

im not the one expecting the world to expect my crackpot theorys with ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF OF CONCEPT.

not even a link or a youtube vid..

it woudl have taken 10 mins to set up a youtube account and post a vid, even that woudl be more than you gave us.,,

if their is some real evidence, qwenn, i will stand up and appologize, im not that much of an ass that i cant except when im wrong, but you need to realise untill you show anything, you must realise you are in the wrong, simply for providing no proof,,

thats like me jumping up now and calling sky.com news proclaiming i have the cure for cancer! then telling the cure is in the mind of teh beholder..

until you provide even a grain of proof or something to even search google for, i propose its YOU who is the fool..

now, you can reply AGAIN, trying to call me a fool, or you can actualy motivate your ass into providing some evidence !!

as calling people who are asking for evidence "fools" just shows a complete lack of reaserch or any sort of scientific merit, science is all about prooving people wrong..

so come on, proove me wrong!

or shut up.

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:53 PM by redled

reply to post by boaby_phet

I wish I could set up a thread saying absolutely nothing and get people to argue the toss with me.

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:56 PM by Qwenn

reply to post by boaby_phet

Any fool can post a phoney you-tube video on any subject, it is only fools and cranks who would use these to prove a point. This whole issue goes back quite a while, any crank would have gone on to a new issue, or registered a new account, to move away from past issues, I have done neither of these. I posted because of u2us and am looking to new input, not crackpots, I will no longer answer stupid posts, anyone who would like to u2u me with infomation is more than welcome. In the past I have been criticised for being secretive and only trusting certain people, well it seems that was a correct assumption!

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 05:56 PM by boaby_phet

reply to post by redled

no weed and no tea makes boaby .... something something..

oh ye,it makes him TOP notch troll bait

i was sucked right in.

im ending all communication from here . unless their are some very worthy biscuits of truth posted

edit - when someone gets this amazing proof via U2U, could you forward to me or post in this thread please !, i actualy love intellectual debate, but i hate people bullying the LHC, its not done anything to anyone except cost a few pennys.

[edit on 12-10-2008 by boaby_phet]

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 06:01 PM by argentus

Okay, I read your other thread on this subject....... well....... most of it: www.abovetopsecret.com... It would seem like you were a tweak less than forthcoming in that thread as well.

I did several searches for "zero one zero protocol", as well as more than a few permutations of that and have come up with ... zero.

I understand from reading your last thread that you are frustrated with the people who ridicule and don't want to intellectually discuss this..... whatever-it-is. You have to expect that. From my observation, this is the second thread about 0-1-0 in which you haven't given us, the ATS readers, anything to go on. Why don't you just lay it out for us? There are a wealth of armchair physicists and just downright knowledgeable folk/philosophers here, as you know. Give us some meat to chew on, we'll discuss, I'm pretty sure.

Cheers

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 06:08 PM by interestedalways

This seems more like a fishing expedition than anything else.

I referred to your other thread as well, OP and I agree with Argentus (sp?) that is was no more forthcoming.

I did see the post by intrepid that mentions something regarding the old cable signals or something like that and you responded "This may help"

So do you know something about this yourself, or are you simply attempting to see if anyone here knows anything?

Edit to add:

I am not trying to be critical as I am truly interested, but in WHAT???

[edit on 12-10-2008 by interestedalways]

reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 06:08 PM by alien