Sherrif Begins Taking Away Concealed Weapons Permits, page 10
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times


reply posted on 16-10-2008 @ 01:04 PM by Swordbeast
reply to post by Heike



Very well written, thank you. If I could, I'd give you more than one star.


reply posted on 16-10-2008 @ 07:11 PM by ZindoDoone
reply to post by Sanitys Last Day



Open carry is not legal in Texas in most cases heres the statute:

tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us...

as usual the language is a bit convuluted but here it is.

Zindo



reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 07:28 AM by Sanitys Last Day
reply to post by ZindoDoone



That is absolutely correct. The one forward step we have made semi-recently is this section of chapter 46:

(a-1) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries on or about his or her person a handgun in a motor vehicle that is owned by the person or under the person's control at any time in which:
(1) the handgun is in plain view; or
(2) the person is:
(A) engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic;
(B) prohibited by law from possessing a firearm; or
(C) a member of a criminal street gang, as defined by Section 71.01.

Chapter 46 of Texas Penal Code

This basically allows us to carry a hand gun while driving any distance as long as you don't violate the limitations listed above. Previous to this you had to be under the definition of "traveling" in order to carry a hand gun in the car (unless you were going to the range or something of the like). Traveling meant you had to be going at least 150 miles from home as well as other vague stipulations.


reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 09:54 AM by ZindoDoone
reply to post by Constitutional Scholar



That is absolutely true but, untill we have enough of our populace that believes this fact and has the gumption to make sure their local authorities understand this principil or be dealt with harshly (thrown out of office), we at least have the right to jump through hoops to have self defense.Even though its aborent to most of us!

Zindo


reply posted on 17-10-2008 @ 12:24 PM by ZindoDoone
reply to post by fmcanarney



As a fellow Kansan ( Born there Also) it always amazed me that I could wonder around with a revolver on my hip openly with no problems, but as soon as I shoved my shortgun into my back pocket to go out at night I was considered a criminal. I was on a coyote hunt east of El Dorado when a Butler county mountie stopped us to inspect our car. I always carried a short barreled .22 so I could dispatch wounded without wasting money, and had it in my vest pocket. He got his panties in a wad and was going to arrest me for concealed carry. I informed him that if he could see the butt of the pistol, then I wasn't carrying concealed. Open carry will be attacked very shortly if Obama and his gang are the majority. Tihart is trying his level best and I hope he continues the good fight for Kansans!
Zindo


reply posted on 19-10-2008 @ 04:09 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Merriman Weir



there are two different classifications of states when it comes to ccdw.

"shall or must" issue states are required by law to issue the permits to qualified individuals,period. take the class,pay the fees,pass the test get the permit,done deal.

"may issue" states i believe they are called, states like california, leave it up to law enforcement to decide if they want to give a ccdw permit even to qualified individuals. so you may jump through all the hoops,pay all the fees and still be denied,or delayed.

to the poster who asked why the ccdw is necessary if the right to bear arms is guaranteed by the constitution. this is actually very simple.you dont need the permit to carry a gun.you only need the permit to carry a gun concealed. carry a gun all you want,just dont have it hidden,no permit needed.


reply posted on 19-10-2008 @ 08:52 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Tiloke


reply to post by Tiloke


Hi Tiloke,

I think the statistics have more to do with cramming far too many humans into teeming cities, whereas Colorado doesn't have that problem yet.

A Christian in California



reply posted on 20-10-2008 @ 08:40 PM by fmcanarney
definition of INFRINGE:

infringe
verb: =break, violate, contravene, disobey, transgress
infringe on or upon:= intrude on, compromise, undermine, limit, weaken, diminish, disrupt, curb, encroach on, trespass on
Collins Essential Thesaurus 2nd Edition 2006 © HarperCollins Publishers 2005, 2

Infringement of the inalienable right to bear and keep arms is already occurring.

I am glad the Second amendment does not say operating arms, else we
would have to check out firing pins in and out of the local constabulatory.

Or some other essential piece of the firearm. That will be one of the next proposal.

The word fringe means the edges, like the fringe on a blanket or shawl.

Look at the third definition below:

fringe (frnj)
n.
1. A decorative border or edging of hanging threads, cords, or strips, often attached to a separate band.
2. Something that resembles such a border or edging.
3. A marginal, peripheral, or secondary part: "They like to hang out on the geographical fringes, the seedy outposts" James Atlas.
4. Those members of a group or political party holding extreme views: the lunatic fringe.
5. Any of the light or dark bands produced by the diffraction or interference of light.
6. A fringe benefit.

A marginal, peripheral, or secondary part: in reference to an arm that would be the magazine, firing mechanism, (semi auto, fully auto), ammunition, how it is born (to bear) concealed, openly carried, loaded, unloaded, and how it is kept, (locked away, disassembled, stored away from children, with barrel lug, with barrel plug, in a safe, in the trunk, glove box, away from reach of driver, in case, in locked box.

The infringement is and has been happening as there are laws, regulations and statutes that deal with all or many of these peripheral marginal and secondary parts of the main issue: TO keep and bear arms.

All of you are currently violating some or one of these many enroachments upon liberty.
So infringement does not strike the core issue of the arm, it concentrates on the peripheral, fringe, secondary aspects and components of the primary right to keep and bear arms.

[edit on 20-10-2008 by fmcanarney]
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 6 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags