TimeLine as of 10/12/08, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 52 times


reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 06:28 PM by FX44rice
reply to post by redhatty

I think that would be unlikely. That would mean the Elite Creditors would not stand to get repaid. Of course the little guys will be happy for debt erasure, but the agenda has not been to help the lowly indebted peasants. What Creditors at the top of the food chain are going to agree to wipe out debt burden?

I think you should all watch this:
video.google.com...

[edit on 12-10-2008 by FX44rice]

[edit on 12-10-2008 by FX44rice]


reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 06:35 PM by redhatty
reply to post by Lebowski achiever



Ah! Gotcha!

I think I did cover that


10.On October 8th, the U.K. pumped the equivalent of 87 billion U.S. dollars into their failed banking system in a desperate attempt to revive their failed financial institutions. At least the U.K. was kind enough to their taxpayers to demand preferred stock which MIGHT one day pay some paltry dividend back to their Treasury--unlike the U.S. TARP plan, which will basically offer nothing to U.S. bag holding taxpayers.


Of course I used a figure in dollars reflective of the 50 billion pounds spent on priority shares.



reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 06:44 PM by Lebowski achiever
reply to post by redhatty



500 Billion Pounds is not 87 Billion Dollars. It is closer to 900 Billion Dollars. Or am I misunderstanding you?


reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 06:45 PM by redhatty


reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 06:49 PM by redhatty
Originally posted by Lebowski achiever
reply to
post by redhatty



500 Billion Pounds is not 87 Billion Dollars. It is closer to 900 Billion Dollars. Or am I misunderstanding you?


Only 50 billion pounds went to the purchase of priority shares, not 500 billion

there are only so many things that can be tracked and confirmed. until money is dispersed, it's hard to say how much went where. I am trying to keep track of things, but I am only 1 person with a job and a household to take care of too, so if I do miss things, I am happy to look into it.

maybe I should change that entry in the OP to reflect that a total of 500 billion pounds is available for injecting capital? What do you think?



reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 06:57 PM by redhatty
reply to post by Lebowski achiever



Updated to read:
10.On October 8th, the U.K. allocated 500 billion pounds sterling to help in the economic crisis, it immediately pumped the equivalent of 87 billion U.S. dollars into their failed banking system in a desperate attempt to revive their failed financial institutions. At least the U.K. was kind enough to their taxpayers to demand preferred stock which MIGHT one day pay some paltry dividend back to their Treasury--unlike the U.S. TARP plan, which will basically offer nothing to U.S. bag holding taxpayers.


Better?


reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 07:01 PM by Lebowski achiever
reply to post by redhatty



Yes thank you! Again, Great work! One of the more important threads in this forum!


reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 07:09 PM by king9072
reply to post by redhatty



Absolutely amazing posts and thread. Hats off, to the redhatty.


reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 07:29 PM by redhatty
reply to post by stander



Oh and I should direct you to this thread
www.abovetopsecret.com...

If you think the derivatives are staggering, check out how the Federal Reserve is completely insolvent!


reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 10:02 PM by John_Q_Llama
Excellent thread. Thanks for the lengthy summation of the situation.

I have a couple questions since it appears that some financially knowledgeable folks are contributing to this discussion.

The first pertains to my personal situation...

My wife and I live in an apartment, so we have no mortgage to worry about. This week we'll be paying off the last of our debt, so I'll be able to start saving up some cash (it's feeling more like the term "credits" is appropriate these days when talking about currency since it's all virtual) again now that we're in the clear. So, no loans, no credit cards...no debt. I have never put money into 401K because I never felt comfortable with that system, and now I'm sort of glad I went that route. My question is this: Given my financial status, am I in a good or bad position for riding out this economic storm? Any why would that be?

The other question I have is regarding nationalization. What exactly does that mean other than that the government would ownership of assets, industry, etc.? I'd rather not have the government meddling in more than they already do, but are there any benefits to nationalizing crippled sectors and corporations? And is nationalization usually permanent, or can it be beneficial as a temporary implementation?

Thanks in advance if anyone take the time to answer those. Again, wonderful and informative thread. I had no idea just how many credits were being magically created and thrown around to try and band aid the global economy. It's very astounding.


reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 11:02 PM by king9072
Originally posted by redhatty
reply to
post by stander



If you think the derivatives are staggering, check out how the Federal Reserve is completely insolvent!



Heheh, and someone in my thread told me the dollar isn't going to collapse...hahaha
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



USDA Forces Whole Foods To Accept Monsanto
  Posted 11 days ago with 99 member flags
Greece wipes out Citizens Debt!! Tells Bankers to suck it
  Posted 12 days ago with 78 member flags
The Collapse of The American Dream Explained in Animation
  Posted 19 days ago with 53 member flags
Obama on the verge of a deal with the banks
  Posted 17 days ago with 23 member flags
EU financial dictatorship agreed to by EU ministers last night
  Posted 19 days ago with 17 member flags
Bankers requesting that Greece become their debt slaves
  Posted 15 days ago with 15 member flags
We’re on the brink, warns Greece ahead of summit
  Posted 13 days ago with 15 member flags