It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

America has 2 choices CFR 1 & CFR 2 (Lewrockwell article)

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 25 2004 @ 07:06 PM
link   
www.lewrockwell.com...

Democrats and Republicans think of Presidential candidates as "their men." They think that these men represent them. In what way? Not their ideas, surely, which Presidential candidates share only randomly with hard-core party members, which is why they invariably ignore their party's platform once they are in office. The platform is never mentioned again. The faithful party member nevertheless thinks, "he's my man."

The suggestion is ludicrous. He is the Council on Foreign Relations' man. He represents either CFR Team A or CFR Team B. This year, he is also Skull & Bones' man. This is a first for Bones. In the past, Bones has been content merely to represent half of the voters, always Republicans: William Howard Taft, George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush. This year, Bones cannot lose. When you think about this, it is amazing. An oath-bound Yale University secret society that inducts only 15 people a year has picked off both candidates. Isn't democracy grand? It is the voice of the people.

Voters are confused about political cause and effect. They think of a Presidential candidate as their man. In fact, they are his people. They exist so as to get his branch of the CFR elected. Fanatically loyal party voters are the party's hip pocket voters. The party can safely pay no attention to them. The party must court voters who are not committed to the ideals of its core supporters, who in turn overlook the fact that their man will sell them out on every major issue that did not have support from the CFR. Most of them have never heard of the CFR.

[snip]

This guy gets it, good analysis. The US and UK, probably most of europe and of course "red" countries like china etc are all one party states for one reason or the other.
I mean im closest to conservative here in the UK but i know if i vote for them i aint getting conservative, im getting a barely distinguishable party from the left they are both internationalist 'third way' (NWO) parties this is clearly evident in a decade+ of policy.

BTW If you're not familiar with this site check out the quote on the home page:
Pay no attention to the "anti-war libertarians at Lewrockwell.com"
-Max Boot CFR




posted on Mar, 26 2004 @ 04:47 PM
link   
OR they could shake off the chains and vote for a third party candidate.


Lets have some NEW theives for a change.



posted on Mar, 30 2004 @ 01:02 PM
link   
there has got to be a way to vote without parties being involved.



posted on Apr, 12 2004 @ 01:47 PM
link   
but i like parties
.



posted on Apr, 12 2004 @ 01:56 PM
link   
left.right..prolife...anti abortion
democrat.republican,black,white.liberal,conservative
baptist,buddhist...etc....etc...etc.....
it gos on for along time....
They are all manipulated by the global elite in order to keep people separated on issues that affect them emotionally,,,,,Divide and Conquer....they are very good at doing it...in fact theyve got it down to a science



posted on Apr, 12 2004 @ 02:05 PM
link   
I don't know about where you live in the US, but we can just write someone's name in. You can vote for others besides the established parties. We got choices, its just that most people don't take the time to learn about the other alternatives.



posted on Apr, 12 2004 @ 02:25 PM
link   
im going to vote for some one else this year also

probably libretarian,but will see...i wasnt going to vote at all ,this year im going to vote with my gut or intuition



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join