reply to post by ticktockboom
You are right, provided the next war does not destroy everything, inadvertantly ruining all their grand schemes. Their plan may not have accounted
for the advent of nuclear weapons the magnitude of which we now possess.
|
reply to post by Recouper
I think most people feel that way, but most people don't get a say.
|
reply to post by shoeshiner
If the plan is to sustain the population to 0.5B that says to me that a whole lot more would have to go, to leave room for growth over generations.
So, for the maximum to be 0.5B mass, they would have to be a population of about 5M to start out with.
Or who knows maybe even less. 
So 1 in 12 being saved could actually end up being 1 in a thousand or near abouts.
And who's to say that its a global equation? It might only be the equivalent of one small country being saved and the rest wiped out?
Scary when you think about it.
|
The trouble with all this theorizing about a massive cull of people is it doesn't work that way. All that does is increase the population believe it
or not. any organism under extreme population stress rebounds by accelerating it's breeding ,people too . So all the wars we are now engaged in as a
world are INCREASING the population.get rid of war and the famine that follows it, provide opportunity and education and you DECREASE,the birthrate
sounds counterintuitive ,but it works . The current WO ,WANTS overpopulation they need an endless supply of uneducated,drug addicted drones that are
forever on the brink of starvation and disease and war mostly war < their cash cow.When Bush and Bilderbergers and the like say NWO they MEAN SAME WO.
They want to confuse you with this annihilation stuff because if you woke up and saw how they accomplish what they want,it would drastically affect
their plan for endless war profit,slave trade and drug trade
[edit on (10/19/0808 by invisiblewoman]
|
