Strange Find on Google Sky, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 13-10-2008 @ 01:54 PM by ngchunter
reply to post by harrytuttle



It's a planet that happened to be in the field of view when IRIS shot that part of the sky. It just happens to be sitting right on the ecliptic - that's never a coincidence with an object that bright. IRIS wasn't designed to look at anything that bright and google sky doesn't know how to handle such over-saturation of the image (plus IRIS is just one source g-sky uses to produce false color IR images - other IR surveys didn't happen to catch this planet at this spot as you can confirm in WWT) so it looks messed up. Here's a regular WWT view of the same region of sky in IRIS's database, it looks just like a planet should to IRIS - blooming and overexposed:
i189.photobucket.com...
This "anomaly" was already discussed to death here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

*Looks like Saturn was near this position when IRIS conducted an observation of the area in May 2007.

[edit on 13-10-2008 by ngchunter]


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 03:23 PM by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by Intelearthling



Just for the record, nobody has ever photographed a black hole. We have photos of what we THINK are the EFFECTS of a black hole, by they don't look like that object. In fact there are some knowledgable people who say the black holes have not yet been proven to exist (although I think they do exist).

The familiar images we all have in our heads of black holes (black round objects with a bright ring of material around it) are all "artists conceptions".


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 10:20 PM by AmmonSeth
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
reply to
post by Intelearthling



Just for the record, nobody has ever photographed a black hole. We have photos of what we THINK are the EFFECTS of a black hole, by they don't look like that object. In fact there are some knowledgable people who say the black holes have not yet been proven to exist (although I think they do exist).



Technically if you want to get picky, Even if black-holes 'existed'
they would immediately not exist, being as a hole is not actually anything,
its the lack of something, So to be reeeeally picky,
The fact there is a lack of something exists, but the hole does not,
Ponder that for a little while
Pages:     ^^TOP^^