The truth behind the founder of Catholicism... it's not St. Peter!!!, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 11-10-2008 @ 03:53 AM by reject
reply to post by Locoman8

Hello,

How come St. Paul speaks glowingly of the Church in Rome in his letter to them?

True, that church has lost its way but it was not so from the beginning and therefore not founded by an apostate self-styled christian.


reply posted on 11-10-2008 @ 09:21 PM by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by Locoman8





The truth behind the founder of Catholicism... it's not St. Peter!!!

Amazing! You make a FALSE claim and then knock that claim down.
Of course, St. Peter didn't found the Catholic Church.
Jesus Christ did.

On your other thread, you quote some paper from 1896, and something from 1913. Get real.
It was founded by Jesus Christ Himself in Mt 16:18. *It would be built on Simon Peter, Mt 16:18. *It would be defended by GOD Himself, Mt 16:18-19. *It would have authority given by Jesus Christ, Mt 16:19,18:17-18. *It would be guided by the Holy Spirit who will dwell within it, Jn 14:15-17, Act 15:28,16:6. *It would be one and undivided, Mk 3:24-25. *It would have one fold and one shepherd, Jn 10:16. *It would have Priests, Bishops, and Deacons, 1Tim 3:1-13. *It must have the Holy Eucharist celebration, Jn 6:42-70, Act 2:42. *It must be found in all nations, Mt 28:19. *It must be found in all centuries, Mt 28:20. *Jesus Christ said He would be with His Church every day, in every year, until the end of the world, Mt 28:20.


That is what the Catholic Church teaches. Period.


reply posted on 11-10-2008 @ 11:14 PM by TheRandom1
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
reply to
post by Locoman8





The truth behind the founder of Catholicism... it's not St. Peter!!!

Amazing! You make a FALSE claim and then knock that claim down.
Of course, St. Peter didn't found the Catholic Church.
Jesus Christ did.

On your other thread, you quote some paper from 1896, and something from 1913. Get real.
It was founded by Jesus Christ Himself in Mt 16:18. *It would be built on Simon Peter, Mt 16:18. *It would be defended by GOD Himself, Mt 16:18-19. *It would have authority given by Jesus Christ, Mt 16:19,18:17-18. *It would be guided by the Holy Spirit who will dwell within it, Jn 14:15-17, Act 15:28,16:6. *It would be one and undivided, Mk 3:24-25. *It would have one fold and one shepherd, Jn 10:16. *It would have Priests, Bishops, and Deacons, 1Tim 3:1-13. *It must have the Holy Eucharist celebration, Jn 6:42-70, Act 2:42. *It must be found in all nations, Mt 28:19. *It must be found in all centuries, Mt 28:20. *Jesus Christ said He would be with His Church every day, in every year, until the end of the world, Mt 28:20.


That is what the Catholic Church teaches. Period.


No, it's not, the Catholic Church teaches many things that are blasphemous, like the idea that if you give the Pope enough money then he can sign this little paper that says you and your whole family can go to heaven, Martha Stewart has some of those, so they still do it. They call the Pope the "Holy Father", Yeshua knocks this down and says in Mat 23:9 "Call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven". Also the Pope is supposed to be infallible, what does the Bible say about this? Read John 3:16. Also they teach that Mary can give salvation and forgive sins, common, do I really need to show you verses that say contrary? These are not fringe beliefs of the Catholic Church, they are founding beliefs of the Catholic Church.

-Lahara


reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 09:34 PM by ProfEmeritus
Originally posted by TheRandom1
No, it's not, the Catholic Church teaches many things that are blasphemous, like the idea that if you give the Pope enough money then he can sign this little paper that says you and your whole family can go to heaven, Martha Stewart has some of those, so they still do it. They call the Pope the "Holy Father", Yeshua knocks this down and says in Mat 23:9 "Call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven". Also the Pope is supposed to be infallible, what does the Bible say about this? Read John 3:16. Also they teach that Mary can give salvation and forgive sins, common, do I really need to show you verses that say contrary? These are not fringe beliefs of the Catholic Church


Prior to the late 1500's, there were some deplorable practices that had been exercised by some popes, such as the sale of indulgences. An indulgence is the remission of temporal punishment still due for a sin that has been sacramentally absolved.
The sale of indulgences was outlawed by the Council of Trent (1545-1563).
Martin Luther had rightly objected to the sale of indulgences, and the Council of Trent was called to try to reconcile with the Protestant Church.

Indulgences are still "granted", but they are not to "Buy" your way into heaven. Instead, indulgences are a way of emphasizing that confession of sins are not sufficient, but true sorrow for sins is a requirement, and works of charity are stressed. If you are really interested in learning what the Church teaches regarding indulgences, here is an excerpt from Wiki that does a pretty good job of explaining them:


An indulgence may be plenary or partial, according as it remits all or only part of the temporal punishment that at that moment is due for sin.[9] To gain a plenary indulgence, a person must exclude all attachment to sin of any kind, even venial sin, must perform the work or say the prayer for which the indulgence is granted, and must also fulfil the three conditions of sacramental confession, Eucharistic communion and praying for the intentions of the Pope.[10] The minimum condition for gaining a partial indulgence is to be contrite in heart: on this condition, a Catholic who performs the work or recites the prayer in question is granted, through the Church, remission of temporal punishment of the same worth as is obtained by the person's own action.[11]

In response to suggestions made at the Second Vatican Council, Pope Paul VI substantially revised the practical application of the traditional doctrine, making it clear that the Church's aim was not merely to help the faithful make due satisfaction for their sins, but chiefly to bring them to greater fervour of charity; it was for this purpose that he decreed that partial indulgences simply supplement, and to the same degree, the remission that the person performing the indulgenced action has already gained by the charity and contrition with which he does it.[3] Previously, partial indulgences were granted as the equivalent of a certain number of days, months, "quarantines"[12] (Lent-like forty-day periods) or years of canonical penance. Those who did not understand these terms sometimes misinterpreted them as meaning a reduction of that length of stay in Purgatory.

The abolition of this classification by years and days made it clearer than before that repentance and faith are required not only for remission of eternal punishment for mortal sin but also for remission of temporal punishment for sin. Pope Paul VI wrote: "Indulgences cannot be gained without a sincere conversion of outlook and unity with God".[13]

AS for forgiving sins, nowhere does the Church say that Mary can forgive sins. Nowhere. On the other hand, Jesus did give priests the power to forgive sins IN HIS NAME in John20:23

John 20:19–23. "On the evening of that day, the first day of the week, the doors being shut where the disciples were, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood among them and said to them, ‘Peace be with you.’ When he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. Then the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord. Jesus said to them again, ‘Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, even so I send you.’ And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, "Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained."


The last verse (23) clearly proclaims that Jesus gave them that power.

As for infallibility of the POPE, it ONLY relates de fide, that is, in matters of faith or dogma. It does NOT apply to earthly matters:

again, from Wiki:
Examples of infallible extraordinary papal definitions (and, hence, of teachings of the sacred magisterium) are Pope Pius IX's definition of the Immaculate Conception of Mary, and Pope Pius XII's definition of the Assumption of Mary. Examples of infallible extraordinary Conciliar decrees include the Council of Trent's decree on justification, and Vatican I's definition of papal infallibility. Examples of infallible teachings of the ordinary and universal Magisterium are harder to point to, since these are not contained in any one specific document, but are the common teachings found among the Bishops dispersed through the world yet united with the Pope. Pope John Paul II specifically clarified that the reservation of ordination to males is infallible under the infallibility of the ordinary and universal magisterium of the Church, without issuing a corresponding extraordinary papal definition. It has been suggested that he did this to remind everyone that the ordinary and universal magisterium is also infallible, and that an extraordinary definition is not necessary to make a teaching irrevocably binding and demanding of supernatural faith. In fact, the ordinary and universal magisterium is the ordinary manifestation of infallibility, the decrees of popes and councils being the only the extraordinary expression.
The Ordinary Magisterium includes the potentially fallible teachings of the Pope and ecumenical Councils (ie, not given ex cathedra) and, more commonly, of individual Bishops or groups of Bishops as taken separately from the whole College. Such teachings are fallible and could possibly contain errors; they are subject to revisions or even, rarely, revocation. In the case of the teachings of individual bishops to their diocese, there can of course even be disagreement among the individual bishops on such issues. However, these potentially fallible teachings are necessary to contribute to the development of doctrine. Eventually, many fallible teachings progress to the point where they can be infallibly defined (such as when they become not only Ordinary, but Ordinary AND Universal). Thus, some teachings move from the Ordinary Magisterium to the Sacred Magisterium.

Example of Ordinary Magisterium includes the so-called Social Teachings of recent popes or theological opinions that the popes or bishops make public.


Those ARE the teachings of the church. You can choose to believe that or not, but in the spirit of ATS to deny ignorance, I have taken the time to try to educate you.

There are quite a few people that spread hatred against many religions. In today's society, as in the past, there is too much hatred in the world.
I see people on ATS that despise war, and that is good. Unfortunately, I see some of those people that then spout hatred against Muslims, Jews, Catholics, Christians, you name it. Well, that hatred is the CAUSE of most wars. We hate the Russians, the Russians hate us, etc.

If people want to eliminate war, and what sane individual wouldn't, then eliminate HATRED, and PEACE will follow. It's such a simple equation.

Peace, my friend.


reply posted on 6-12-2008 @ 01:48 AM by Locoman8
reply to post by ProfEmeritus



I find it funny that you think because Jesus gave the Apostles the power to forgive sins in His name, that all priests and popes do. Popes aren't even ordained by God, but by a council of cardinals who choose a pope. The "church" you claim to be the one Jesus founded has a few differences than the original apostolic church. For starters, the first century church of God celebrated the 7 holy day feasts commanded by God in Leviticus 23. Catholics and their protestant splinter groups celebrate holidays mixed with pagan tradition such as easter, christmas, halloween(all saints day), etc. Jesus never emphasized to celebrate His birth but to always honor His death.... which was on Passover, not "good friday" as mentioned in the gospels. He ressurrected during the middle of the "Feast of Unleavened Bread", not "easter". He was born sometime between march and october due to the fact that "shepherds were in the field at night tending to their flocks" which would not be done in the winter time. The Roman census would not take place in winter but most likely during a Holy Day pilgrimage like the "Feast of Tabernacles" when the masses would already be together. The Roman solar calendar is not the calendar used by the early church or Jews. Saturday remains the holy sabbath and was never changed by Jesus who called Himself "Lord of the Sabbath". It is a commandment that is to be kept and not changed. The crucifix cross, the symbol of catholicism is a form of idolatry which is something God and Jesus speak against. It is an image in the likeness of God, or in this case the Son of God. Hail Mary is a blasphemous practice because it's the worship of someone other than God. The Trinity is false doctrine because the holy spirit is not a seperate entity from God or Jesus but the presence of God. I can go on and on. His true church would remain small and persecuted throughout history. To this date there is a small number of true apostolic churches that follow all of God's laws and bylaws outside of the fulfilled laws of sacrifice. Many of these church congregations belonged to the 20th century church of God known as the Worldwide Church of God. They believed in the true doctrine of the Kingdom of God here on earth and that all are dead in the grave until the return of Christ and/or the judgement. This is supported by John 3:13 "no man has accended into heaven except He who came from heaven which is the Son of man who is in heaven." This shouldn't be an argument but that's what you turn it into. This is called "conspiracy in religions" and to me the catholic church with it's splinter groups are part of the deception satan has brought to the christian faith as the apostles of the new testament claimed was already going on in their time. Read your bible.... then think for a minute without the corrupt beliefs catholicism has drilled into your mind. That's what I had to do being raised up a baptist.


reply posted on 6-12-2008 @ 04:01 AM by justamomma
reply to post by badmedia



I tend to agree with his first statement. I am not sure why people make such a huge deal over the catholic when there are many churches that are full of paganism and mysticism.

Hell, the evangelical churches (the majority) are supporting the slaughtering and displacement of people in the middle east.

The pentecostal and charismatic churches practice occultism and mysticism.. it is just masked by the name of god (lower case and not hyphened because it is a false god).

Alot of baptist churches and mega churches are into social and material gain as well as unknowingly (which goes to show they know little about the book they profess they stand on) incorporating teachings of comprimise and acceptance of practices that book they throw in ppl's faces specifically forbids.

Most churches are full of crap.... yes, this includes the catholic church, but the other churches are just as retarded and full of the practices that they preach against.




[edit on 6-12-2008 by justamomma]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



"God is an Imaginary Friend" Athiest Billboards in Denver-
  Posted 18 days ago with 31 member flags
Why are these 10 figures just like Jesus Christ??
  Posted 5 days ago with 14 member flags
I am an imposter in Church
  Posted 4 days ago with 11 member flags
What Kind of Christianity Is This?
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags
The Great Flood Was Caused By A Comet?
  Posted 11 days ago with 7 member flags
Advert claiming cure through prayer is banned
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags
The real Jewish people. Torah Jews Against ZIONISM
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 15 hours ago, 109 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 11 hours ago, 94 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 13 hours ago, 50 replies