reply to post by poet1b
I am agreeing with Areal51 on this one.
I read back through the thread, and it would appear you are the one that brought up half the stuff you are arguing about. NOT him.
But, since I can't resist, the question isn't if its wrong for her to try and terminate a trooper who tazered a kid. if thats the story you're
going with, I'd have to ask one other question: Is it wrong for her to lie about it afterwards.
If she was REALLY trying to fire the top cop for not following through on disciplinary action that was needed... she should have just said so, and no
other questions would be asked.
instead, she says she terminated him because of a trip to Washington DC... that her office authorized?
Sounds like the Top Cop was the victim of political B.S. to me...
She has a history of being vindictive, and pushing her authority around to accomplish personal goals. Hell, look at the city of Wasilla's
involvement in "loosening" building/property codes so she could sell her house...