posted on Oct, 10 2008 @ 07:25 PM
"... they retouch to get rid of the normal flaws that real people have"... does this not sound like an oxymoron? normal flaws? i cant see how normal
characteristics are flaws.. they are angry for no retouches, but showing the "wrinkles, the pores, the facial hair" helps relate that she is a real
person... the fact that that b*tch thinks that people will be (justly) voting based on crap like that shows how retarded that lady is and everything
she represents, and is basically calling every american the same. maybe she thinks she and the world are still in high school together?
get a clue,
get off my internet,
and i swear i will perform home-surgery with a butterknife and a lit cigarette to burn the knowledge of her existence from my brain, if the memory
doesnt fade in the next 5 minutes on its own.
I mean, im all for hot lookin wimmens, but we are talking about high profile potential leaders of the freakin country, not voting on america's next
what a twisted, inbred, swine-brained chunk of backwards human feces that lady is, she shoulda been swallowed instead. And i bet they lobby for
women's rights too....
[/angry rant. im going outside]
[edit on 10-10-2008 by kidney thief]