The last and only time a presidential figure was called a traitor...

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 12 2008 @ 10:52 PM
link   
reply to post by bknapple32
 


I think that you need to understan what's in the mind of a person that thinks that Obama is a terrorrist or a traitor.

Since there is definately no evidence to support that you have to understand that this people are either straight up racist, ethnophobic's or BOTH.

Take a look at these videos:
Obama the arab


Obama the terrorist


Obama should be killed


This racism and ethnophobia is real, that was the same kind of sentiment that a considerable portion of citizens in this country would give to someone that was either from japanese or german decent during WW2, the same kind of sentiment towards blacks during the Civil Rights era, the same kind of sentiment towards anyone that would be linked to communism during the Cold War years, is the same kind of sentiment towards Arabs and muslims.

IMO who ever calls Obama a terrorist or a traitor do it out of these two, there is no other way around it, they might try to explain or excuse themselves as to why , but when pressed with the facts you can see and sense that there is no other reason than minds that are full of bigotry, racism, ethnophobic thoughts.

Let them be...this country in 20 or 30 years is going to be a very different country, a country where the monirities are going to rule and people with these kind of minds are going to slowly die and dissapear and then maybe 100 years from that date we are going to look back at this people and compare them with neanthertals in the sense that not because they had a brain it meant that were fully capable to understand certain things.




posted on Oct, 12 2008 @ 10:58 PM
link   
reply to post by jam321
 


I recognize Obama's fault when they are there and have told this many times, I just dont't see how you can call Obama healthcare plan socializing if you are trying to compare it with other countries NATIONALIZATION of health care programs. But been that as it may, I tell this again, I rather have my tax dollars to help the health condition of those in need rather than have them given to Wall St. firms.

Given the corruption that is rampant in Washington I think this plan would be one of the few actions that the Federal Government could take to impact the life of many citizens in a positive manner. There is not that many times that the government would actually do something good for their people.



posted on Oct, 12 2008 @ 11:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Maya00a



Please choose wisely America - whichever candidate you choose will also be having a huge influence on world affairs.
there's a lot more people IN THE WORLD that are relying on you to make the right choice. A lot of hopes and fears are riding on your election. The world is going to be holding it's breath.



Sorry, there ARE no good choices. We have a choice between liar "A" or liar "B". Pirate or conman. Thief or robber. The only decent choice didn't get the time of day from the media.

On a conspiratorial note.....this election may prove to be a nice distraction to the land, money and power grab the elites hope we won't notice is going on. Whoever gets elected probably won't last for long anyway.

It's all just a side show so quit holding your breath and take time to smell the flowers before doing so is considered the action of an enemy combatant.



posted on Oct, 12 2008 @ 11:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Bunch
 


you probably got a good point their about wall street. I really think health care started failing when we started losing manufacturing jobs and switched them for service jobs. Service jobs for the most part pay a lot less and offer less benefits.

I am looking at this plan and it seems pretty good using both government and private to solve this problem.


let me know what you think

voicefortheuninsured.com...



posted on Oct, 18 2008 @ 10:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by bknapple32
 


you better convince our government what defines a terrorism. Some people are terrorist just for being peaceful activist.

check this link out

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Obama does have socialistic plans. His rich to poor plan reminds me of what hugo chavez did in Venezuela.


I agree with the expanded use of terrorist. When the first patriot act came in use I noticed that policement were using the term rather loosley. Once it was an american domestic disturbance and the policeman called it in as the guy was a terrorist....this was on cops.

But the Rich/poor program is what is needed in the US. Bushes trickle down economics were just something he used to give his buddies some extra scratch.
I think, and heard McCain saying that he was going to follow Bushs lead. Well you know where were heading with Bush right? These people whining about the gun control Obama is for ect ect.
Wait until our country has Martial law declaired. The patriot act 2 empowers the government to take anything they want, relocate anyone they want and designate ANYONE for government service.
I have a pretty good printout of this but cant fit it into the space here.
This is a short printout:
All of the below laws were signed and
approved last year (May 2007) by
President Bush, and can be enforced in
the event of a "national emergency" that
he believes affects the entire country.



posted on Oct, 18 2008 @ 11:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Douggie
 


All of the below laws were signed and
approved last year (May 2007) by
President Bush, and can be enforced in
the event of a "national emergency" that
he believes affects the entire country.

Oh well it wont let me post it.

[edit on 13/10/08 by Douggie]



posted on Oct, 18 2008 @ 11:49 AM
link   
reply to post by whitewave
 


Im sorry, but I for one am getting sick of this constant McCain Obama bashing by the, well I dont know what to call them. This was a thread for Obama being called a terrorist. Not another forum for you to mention ron paul.



posted on Oct, 18 2008 @ 12:07 PM
link   
reply to post by bknapple32
 


Guess what? McCain has been called a terrorist, Bush has been called a terrorist. Plain has been called a neo-nazi and a terrorist. Why is it so much more important when its Obama? What makes him so special?

The only people calling him a terrorist are fringe minority of rural voters. McCain, Palin and Bush have been called that and much worse by the main stream media....





new topics
top topics
 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join