It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You can call me crazy.....prior to this i was leaning for McCain but was thinking about not voting at all. He just took my vote.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by Bunch
come on bunch, do you hold musicians responsible for controlling their crowds?
And not everyone wants to hear about economy. Just talking about economy isn't going to fix it. If anything it brings up more anxiety because of all the gloomy words they use. If 700Billion dollars can't fix it I doubt them talking about it day after day will do anything either.
Uneducated people....do they not also have the right to express what they feel? We may not agree with what they say but they also have freedom of speech. But you are also right that maybe McCain should be more selective.
proposal to buy up bad home mortgages would use nearly half the $700 billion from the recent Wall Street bailout package to assist Americans directly, instead of indirectly by rescuing the nation's financial markets.
"I would order the secretary of the Treasury to immediately buy up the bad home-loan mortgages in America and renegotiate at the new value of those homes — at the diminished values of those homes — and let people be able to make those payments and stay in their homes," he said. The proposal, which he called the American Homeownership Resurgence Plan, is as much a policy plan for the future as it is a political tactic for the present. The economy has been a key factor in helping Obama pull ahead of McCain nationally and in key battleground states. What's more, Americans reacted with helpless outrage at the need for a $700 billion rescue for the country's financial institutions.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by bknapple32
cause he does have ties with a terrorist and it bears on Obama judgment and if you don't understand this then you are either blind or lying.
And as far as his middle name, it falls under freedom of speech. Just because this person or that person doesn't use it has no bearing on the fact that anybody can use it.
You may not like it or feel that their is a mean reason for them doing it but just the same they have every right to use it.
Originally posted by DarkStormCrow
I will vote for who I want to without being intimidated.
Originally posted by jam321
He asked who is Obama?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
If he had a stroke of conscience, he'd instruct Palin to lay off, too.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by bknapple32
cause he does have ties with a terrorist and it bears on Obama judgment and if you don't understand this then you are either blind or lying.
And as far as his middle name, it falls under freedom of speech. Just because this person or that person doesn't use it has no bearing on the fact that anybody can use it.
You may not like it or feel that their is a mean reason for them doing it but just the same they have every right to use it.