The 'happy making' general conspiracy

Part I:

Which 1-2 events conspired on through (**below) would make you feel honestly happy if you look at the results in the long run:

A) The U.S. deads the presidency so that there is never a president again.

B) A bunch of Timothy McViegh types blow up all state federal buildings in the U.S.

C) The citizens of the U.S. arrest all working for the federal government.

D) The women of the U.S. band together and stop having babies inorder to discontinue the U.S. recycling its same ol' failed systems.

E) The news media/the press in the whole U.S. exercize freedom of the press by not airing anything the U.S. government wants made public and not airing anything the public wants the government to make public either.

F) The U.S. military's airforce make a U-turn and bomb up everything in the U.S.'s capitol city and the CIA headquarter and the other military training/stationing forces areas homed in the U.S.

G) The gun stores all across America go against all gun laws, and sell any firearms to anyone with the cash as an effort for the public to rise up against the U.S.

Part II:

Is there any other 'happy making' general conspiracy which should be added to the list? Express it.



[edit on 10-10-2008 by Mabus]

"Rev 9

14Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates.

15And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men.

16And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand: and I heard the number of them."


^^The third part "of" men can be the function/system of men such as the government, which owns and rules a third of our lives since we are its citizens under laws. So a 'happy making' conspiracy is bound to occur to take down the third part making men feel desolated (ruined, sad) all along.

^^The question to such is: When?! When will such a none-currently existent army emerge to take down the ruiner function/system, to express they arent taking crap that's ruining (and saddening) a third part of them anymore?

[edit on 10-10-2008 by Mabus]

reply to post by Mabus



part 1

(D) The women of the U.S. band together and stop having babies inorder to discontinue the U.S. recycling its same ol' failed systems.

Sophocles' 'Lysostrata' is about the women refusing to have sex w/men until the men stopped going to war. I prefer that route.

part 2
immediately execute anyone with access to --choose one-- over (a) $10,000 in cash, (b)$100,000 in cash or (c) $1,000,000 in cash.

The many on this site not happy with the current world governments fail because they are only the sad makers. It's like loving to be sad and loving to have something to complain about endlessly with no effort to end what is causing the complaining. The sad mourn just the way they prefer, being 'for' a sad long run.

We 'happy makers' must take down the sad that's dragging at us.

If you sad, and do nothing to make happy yourself, then you are, as we speak, asuring you post no answer in this thread because it would be an act of happy. And we know you sad ones are against any acts of happiness. We cant see a nipple on t.v. now because you sad types go way out the way to make it so we all rather see the sad things (like someone who is being operated inside where their insides are seen--yuck!).

I shame any sad makers.

On the real, we must be for the 'happy making' conspiracies, and remove the sad makers by any means. Raise up!

It's the "Happy go lucky" type VS the "Sad stop lucky" type.

Happy defeats sad any day. Cant even be happy in court to laught without a sad maker type accusing you of being a monster. Hell, the sad are dead seriously far more a monster than the guy who happens to find the serious moment funny. Are we happy types supposed to darken down instead of lighten up? Sheesh! The happy should slap the sad to give them a reason to be sad about after they get all ugly about our moment of a happy laughing. I mean, hey, can a guy not have a case of the giggles in peace, and get a bless you? I mean, why bless someone who spread germs after they sneeze for? Blessing that bull means your all for the sad state continueing, knowing the germ is going to spread and make ppl sickly sad. Dont you think you should say, "Damn you!", after someone sneeze so the germs are damned and so the person should know that sneezing any ol where is never acceptable when they damn well know they should be at home till the germ is taken care of?

[edit on 10-10-2008 by Mabus]