It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

World exclusive! most significant and undeniable ufo videos of all time that also cover aliens

page: 8
96
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 02:02 PM
link   
Did anybody notice that at the end of the video when u have the chance to watch the other one that it says the videos are submitted by Fox Mulder ? P.s. Thanx for the star wars vid my kids loved it .




posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 02:11 PM
link   
I want to believe more than anybody. But it looks like he is filming CGI on his TV via a video camera.



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 02:30 PM
link   
- This craft could be of Galactic Federation of Light?
- Project Blue Beam?
- US Military Black Project ?
- Satellite?
- Mounting?

It can be any possibility. But lately have been giving UFO news alerts, UFO declassified documents and alien contacts. I think that between now and 2012, there will be the great one a lot of declassified information unknown to this day hidden by all governments of the world and mainly the U.S. government. If it is possible that they are of the Galactic Federation of Light, why are displayed front of us?



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 03:09 PM
link   
I don't even know what to say about the video and how its supposed to be an alien craft and "most significant" till date, but if its so common and almost a daily occurrence, why no one even bothered to go and take a look at it ?

Are people more interested in doing watchman duty and catching fish these days rather than going out and welcoming the ET guests ?



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 03:38 PM
link   
Nice of you to make people aware of this spectacular and genuine footage, but I've already seen it a while back.


[edit on 11-10-2008 by Majorion]



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 03:41 PM
link   
I'm Turkish and I have a summerhouse very very close to "kumburgaz" where this was said to be filmed. First thing I can say is that there are no oil platforms on the marmara sea. If this wasn't from Haktan Akdogan, I would probably take it as the real deal. But when is name comes front there is always suspicion. From what I have seen the filmers seem quite used to these anomalies, thats why they are not reacting with panic. Well, you never know, this may be it or not. Have to see it first hand to believe I guess..



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 04:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by sotp
Ok just my tuppence worth..

The darkening of the hull effect does have me perplexed somewhat, although I believe the effect could be achieved by using iron filings and a large magnet.

(edits for spelling and grammer)

[edit on 11/10/08 by sotp]

[edit on 11/10/08 by sotp]


It could also be achieved by putting your hand in front of the light or somebody accidentally standing in front of the light that is shining on the model. No need for it to be fancy magnets and filings. It is just a shadow.



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 04:49 PM
link   
Could someone point to specific times where the "entities" could be seen? I ran through the whole video but did not see any.



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 05:02 PM
link   
reply to post by groingrinder
 


It's CGI plain and simple, just download Adobe Aftereffects there are plenty of tutorials to produce the same effect with the tracking and blur options, he's a more aftereffect efforts







[edit on 11/10/2008 by spitefulgod]



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 05:03 PM
link   
reply to post by spitefulgod
 


I think you're giving the subject of this thread a bit too much credit.
This video doesn't even use CGI, just a funky model.

[edit on 11-10-2008 by Phage]



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 05:04 PM
link   
Bloody hell, this is no more different than the last set of video by this guy, they look the same, taste the same ...And more importantly SMELL THE SAME...

I'm sorry, but would I publish the most important video ever on a Turkish website ran the the owner of a museum and coin artist or do it for the world to see..

Utter nonsense and a shameless plug for the guy...

Ian All honesty, do any of his vids look real to you..????



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 05:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


I think you give them too much credit a setting up a model and stage would take effort, lol

[edit] but you're right, after watching the video fully and for the second time it's obviously a model.

[edit on 11/10/2008 by spitefulgod]



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 05:23 PM
link   
Almost 7 billion people on this planet, a good majority armed with an arsenal of high quality video production equipment, technology blasting out of our ears in ever more convenient and portable forms and this is the best we can do. More and more blurry photos to add to the heap, insignificant specks of colour in the night sky and no points of reference. I believe wholeheartedly in the UFO topic, just not on the abilities of the average person to operate recording equipment. I'll say 'wow' when something really is worthy of the tag. This video is interesting, but useless. It'll be dismantled by sceptics in a second.

Th8nker



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 05:47 PM
link   
i have been on cruises and lights from other ships can take on many shapes, and these were taken from the seashore. especially if you have any type of mist or fog around the ship you are looking at. some ships have strings of lights, such as common cruise ships, large fishing boats. plus lights from ships can give off dim ghosting light reflected immediately around the vessel. also the light on the black and white "object" seem to be on the same edge in each event over different days. that means the "object" would have had to been in the same place in the sky, shot from the same direction over the course of many months.



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 06:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage

Originally posted by stonespiral
Would the ISS be that big on a camera though? Even zoomed in? I'd tink it would look rather small.

www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...

That would be a yes.


I'm gonna have to disagree with Phage, and agree with stonespiral.

If you look via astronomy sites, ISS pictures using a telescope are not that clear, nor are they that big.

www.esa.int...

I'm not saying it's a true spaceship, but probably not the ISS...



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 06:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by reynoldt
- This craft could be of Galactic Federation of Light?
- Project Blue Beam?
- US Military Black Project ?
- Satellite?
- Mounting?

It can be any possibility. But lately have been giving UFO news alerts, UFO declassified documents and alien contacts. I think that between now and 2012, there will be the great one a lot of declassified information unknown to this day hidden by all governments of the world and mainly the U.S. government. If it is possible that they are of the Galactic Federation of Light, why are displayed front of us?


The Galactic Federation of Light doesn't exist George. It's just a fantasy created by an over delusional mind.

Read Phage's post. It's all there. This video is clearly a hoax.

And to the newcomers. Stop starring and flagging the s**t out of this thread.

A fake video doesn't deserve flags and stars. It will undermine ATS's credibility.

[edit on 11-10-2008 by AntisepticSkeptic]



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 06:33 PM
link   
Well, at least it's not CGI.

More like wicked oldskool model action.



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 06:35 PM
link   
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

OK, here's what clued me in.

1. I noticed that the bottom of the 'craft' looked like there was an overlay and it wasn't a 3-D type of image - the top looked like an object, but the bottom looked like it was behind a piece of cardboard the same color as the background. In fact it might have been a sheet of felt and a piece of felt over a cardboard backing, guaranteeing the background and foreground would match.

2. No stars, nothing in the 'background' at the top to indicate outside. No outlines of trees or buildings or streetlights. So it didn't seem like it was outside. Later you seem to hear outside noises. I think they probably opened a window.

3. The commentary wasn't excited at all. Just some chit chat. A big 'tell'.

4. Upon capture of a still it was clear from the pixellation there was a foreground object (black cardboard) over something.

5. It looks like a small object up close - the detail is sharp in a couple frames. This is not a large image far away.

6. The movement is obviously caused by the camera motion. You can find some landmarks in the background and in addition the perspective of the object never changes.

7. In a real object flying you see it banking or turning or even just changing orientation to the viewer. You'd see a little more of the bottom, or side or top. This image was completely fixed. Thus a stationary model. If you're going to do that at least put it on a string.


8. The camera is almost always centered on the object. In a real video except a hovering craft, the camera loses the image from time to time as the photographer tries to track it. In fact any video you see where the object is centered too much, anticipated, or the camera seems to know before it's seen where it's going to show up it's a good 'tell' (like in playing poker a 'tell' is a revealing aspect).

9. The clicking. Obviously lights turning on or the remote control switch being pushed to turn the lights on in the model.

10. The object never 'flies away'. Most of the time, a real object flying in the sky will leave the area. This one stays in the center view for 9+ minutes. Why stop there? Most vids of real flying craft end with it flying away, though in a better 'fake' they do that too.

HTH. There are other 'tells' but those were the main ones.


As you can see there wasn't just one clue there were ine obvious clues it was a small model filmed up close, ridgedly fixed with a piece of cardboard or felt over the bottom of it. They wanted to exploit the fact that the model had battery powered 'running lights' but obviously if it was a model of the Enterprise or a Klingon ship then that would be uh, too obvious.

If anyone finds the exact model that was used with the mono-headlight on it, please post it here.

As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 07:11 PM
link   
Every bit of footage in reference to the metallic structures are completely isolated from any form of 'real world' influence, with the exception of a moon that looks faintly like a lamp. I could be wrong, but...

Also, over the time line of May 23rd to July 2nd, the metallic structures are reflecting light from, presumably, the moon - except the moment it shines its own light which is very distinguishable. Through the end of May (waxing crescent) and eventually into the beginning of July (new moon), there are hardly any distinctions in the amount of reflection off these surfaces in my opinion.

July 2nd was a new moon (or so I looked up via StarDate Online and Virtual Reality Moon Phase Pictures) and there is still the same reflection off the isolated, suggestible, metallic structures.

As for the lights, I can't offer any criticism.

EDIT: Except to say they merely help suggest the idea of what's new.

[edit on 11-10-2008 by ulyaoth]



posted on Oct, 11 2008 @ 07:24 PM
link   
Could anyone say where there are any entities in this film?

saw none, that I could discern,

Overall,, I think is BS..

People here are vacinated against these fake things


From Turkey they could be more original and send us a film of a magic carpet fly over.. I heard there are plenty over there !





top topics



 
96
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join