Ok just my tuppence worth...
I'm a believer, it's not often I'll cry foul, and even less often that I'll try to back it up!
Anyhoo...here's what I think...
Img. 1 - As has been said, could be the ISS or a satellite
Img. 2 - Thick black fabric background with a hole cut for the 'moon', e.g a large torch (it looks to me like the halo around the 'moon' has
something flat behind it) the small "UFO" effect is created by running a small penlight under the large light
Img.3 - Where is this guy supposedly filming this from? He seems almost perpindicular to the 'UFO'. In order to do that surely he'd have to be
flying, perhaps on the wing of a fighter jet? What do you mean that would account for the shaky cam? Uh-huh. To me it looks like there is absolutely
no continuity of forward movement, just little jerks back and forth. Also, it seems to me that all of these kind of 'UFO's' have a flattish surface
(circled) of roughly the same shape on the bottom, which I think is the 'UFO' resting on some form of flat panel, which extends back through the
aforementioned black background. Behind the curtain (as it were) someone jerks the 'UFO' around a bit, but not much, and not very convincingly (see
crudely drawn image below) There are one or two light sources reflecting off the 'UFO'. It seems strange that on such a 'beautiful moonlit night,
no stars are visible...
Img. 4 - This looks to me like the side of a fully loaded container ship sitting almost on the horizon, with dusky sunlight hitting it's side.
(crappy illustration by me)
Img. 5 - This section starts off centred on a quite 3D looking 'UFO' but then there a quick camera movement and then centres on what honestly looks
to me like a flat piece of paper, that's even been torn (circled). When it "changes it's shape" it looks to me like someone is behind it in much
the same way as in my crappy drawing. It could be attached to at least 3 sticks, to give the illusion of movement. The darkening of the hull effect
does have me perplexed somewhat, although I believe the effect could be achieved by using iron filings and a large magnet.
Img. 6 - Again, could be boats, oil/gas platforms. The lack of movement again has me dubious. At one time I could swear it looked like laterns on a
beach hut on a slightly distant beachhead that is hard to make out because of the sea between it and the camera. Then I began to lose my mind.
Img. 7 - As if to add credence to my suspicions, it seems to me the cameraman is telling the guy 'behind the curtain' not to shake the model,
'cause that would make it look fake. More so.
Img. 8 - I swear in this one it looks like a model sitting on top on someones foot! Those look like tootsies! I'm not sure if those toes wiggle a
little before the cameraman says "don't do that!".
They also seem to be obsessed with telling us what 'it's' doing all the time, especially that "it's moving slowly". Seems strange to me for some
reason. I forgot to mention the one taken from what seems to be a porthole. It looks like a helicopter approaching.
Anyway, that's why I think it's all a big crock.
sotp
(edits for spelling and grammer)
[edit on 11/10/08 by sotp]
[edit on 11/10/08 by sotp]