It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why we no longer need men! Or why Parthenogenesis is cool!

page: 3
2
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 30 2008 @ 02:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by kupoliveson

All I am saying is somebody needs to get a grant and study this! Women of the world unite! The main down side to this however is who is going to take out the trash and mow the lawn?

There is a ongoing hypothesis called "mueler's rachet" that states that i any asexual population the amount of genetic deficiencies will build up to a point that the purely asexually reproducing organisms are doomed given any length of time. But we could keep a few males around just to mix things up a bit!


What a nice example of how a woman can be as sexist as any man could ever hope to be. Oh but wait... you were joking. If so, it was in bad taste and poorly thought through. One member posted wondering if you realized how crazy your comments make you sound. I'd disagree with that post. Why give crazy people a bad name? Your comments don't so much make you sound crazy, as they do just plain stupid. Good luck with your sexist agenda


Peace



new topics
 
2
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join