Brown declares 'war' on Iceland over refusal to hand back the billions it owes to British savers, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 1-11-2008 @ 07:57 PM by ashamedamerican
Originally posted by Rockpuck
So we have poor Iceland, which the World SHOULD be trying to help any way possible right now .. is being viciously ATTACKED by a run away douche bag in the British Government invoking, among all things, a freaking TERRORIST law against the people. Sort of like.. an ambulance chaser (as we call them here in the States) .. Iceland falls apart at the seams, it looks like they are in for a very harsh depression.. and the UK is demanding what little money they have, freezing corporate assets and government investments which essentially is a club to the head of a drowning man!

I agree 100% it's like the grinch coming back for that last tiny little crumb...

In other news, reports are now surfacing that iceland has acquired 150 nuclear missiles from russia, and that Geir Haarde was quoted telling Gordon Brown to "say hello to my little friend" in a meeting earlier today.

When the Bush administration was asked for a statement regarding whether or not they would back up their allies in the U.K. by joining the newly formed "coalition of the greedy" Führer Bush replied "Well hell no, theres no money in it for Haliburton or K.B.R., besides we're too busy invading small defenseless countries of our own. However we WILL be selling weapons to both sides"

The Icelandic suicide bombers who are responsible for the recent destruction of britain's parliament building yesterday have been positively identified after a lengthy post mortem removal of their "guy fawkes" masks, but their identities are being withheld by british authorities due to an ongoing investigation.

On the medical front, worldwide sales of prozac have tripled since the beginning of the crisis.
(yes It was sarcasm)

Seriously though is it just me or has the entire planet finally "flipped it's noodle" and gone out to lunch mentally?


reply posted on 3-11-2008 @ 04:53 PM by Fang
reply to post by kindred



Really? How did they manage that? Remind me of their role in the US sub prime market?



reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 04:46 AM by kindred
The only thing that these people protect is themselves and their fascist agenda. Only an idiot would spend their way out of debt, but that's Gordon Brown all over.

Europe's Financial Mess: Leaders Wanted
"This is no time for a novice," declared Prime Minister Gordon Brown at his party conference two weeks ago. What the British people wanted, he said, was decisive leadership and action that would help them with their mortgages, their jobs, their businesses.

His rallying call, a swipe at his inexperienced opposition leader David Cameron, brought him a brief reprieve. After all, in the current financial crisis, who better to lead than the Iron Chancellor who presided over our decade of economic growth and solemnly promised an end to the cycles of boom and bust.

Back in September, Brown's speech was a masterstroke. He was fighting a leadership battle within his own party, as rebel MPs urged a change of leadership. Yet soon after the conference, Former Home Secretary Charles Clarke, wrote in the Sunday Times that Brown lacked both leadership and clarity of purpose. "The prevarication and evasion may appear attractive at the moment, they are actually the most dangerous course of all."

These were prophetic words. The financial crisis has well and truly exposed Brown as a ditherer, incapable of making decisions under pressure. In the last few days, he and Chancellor Alistair Darling have driven the City of London into a frenzy of speculation. Their reluctance to take decisive action over the banking system has contrasted sharply with the leaders of Germany, Spain, Ireland, Greece and Denmark who have offered superior guarantees for their banks and assurances to the public. Brown's hesitation has undermined confidence, with the result that money has flooded out of the country and the stock market has crashed.

As one commentator said today, the only sensible conclusion to draw is that while he remains in office the economic crisis is likely to get even worse. Another, in one of hundreds of comments on this story, puts it more starkly: "for Gods Sake Brown, take action, be decisive. This country is about to go down—either do something or move aside so that someone who will, can, before it's too late."

Also getting hundreds of responses is the blog of Robert Peston, the BBC's business correspondent, who has emerged as a popular hero in recent weeks. Several times a day, he unravels the complexity of the financial crisis and shows he is often several steps ahead of Treasury ministers. His calm, informative and clear-headed reports on radio, television and the web are a badly needed antidote to the government's obfuscation, confusion and side-stepping.

Another hero is Vince Cable, Shadow Chancellor for the third party in British politics, the Liberal Democrats. An economist by training, he is the only politician who has offered any specific policy responses to the crisis and has done so in a straightforward and clear way. But while he is revered by the public, he is sitting powerless between the two major parties, one of which is fiddling while London burns while the other waits for the kill.

In fairness, Brown is not the only leader who has been found lacking in recent days. Angela Merkel's confusing announcement about bank guarantees sent markets plummeting yesterday, while other European leaders have done little more than put on a show of united leadership while focusing on their own problems. Business and political leaders in the US were also shown to be in disarray last week when the financial bail-out package, first rejected by Congress, was only adopted after significant revisions.

How do you lead in crisis? What works and what doesn't work? How have your own business and political leaders responded to the current crisis? And what lessons have they learned?


www.businessweek.com...


reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 04:56 AM by Waldy
If you want to learn more about this from trusted sources I suggest you check out this link: indefence.is...

The reality is that if Gordon Brown doesnt stop the bully tactics, unborn Icelanders will have to pay for the debts of private banks that worked within the EES regulation and did nothing illegal. Why doesnt he declare terrorist law on the German and US banks that have gone bankrupt and not been able to repay all depositors?


reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 05:29 AM by Waldy
reply to post by Nonchalant



It could be the strategic location of the country. It could be the abundance of clean energy sources. It could be all the fish in the ocean around the country. Or it could be this.

Edit to add this link

[edit on 6-11-2008 by Waldy]


reply posted on 6-11-2008 @ 06:22 AM by DataWraith
Seeing as the councils were 'lured' by high interest rates of the Icelandic banks , doesn't that mean that they had no trust in the UK banks anyways?
Or where they just trying to dodge taxes?
I worry about hearing stories like this, it just reeks of corruption. as the council members waste millions of refurbishing their offices and mutliple homes with upto date electronic entertainment systems paid for by the tax payer, they then have to go somewhere that pays 'higher interest' to offset what they have creamed off the top we as UK citizens pay in council taxes.
I think that the council bosses whould pay back what they have stolen , and I mean stolen because they have lined their own nests with luxury whilst the elderly and infirm have to go without heating and food over the winter months just to be able to pay their council tax and heating bills.
The council bosses 'lured' by the pound signs should have trust in their own country but its obvious that they don't. and they should be held accountable to the public when they money they have put in a foreign bank gets lost in a crisis such as we are having now.
PM Brown has even declared 'economic war' against Iceland and used 'anti terrorism'? laws to freeze they're assets as a ransom till they pay back what they owne the UK. Anti terrorism laws? aren't they for terrorists and financial backers of terrorists? since when does the PM use these laws against another country? Sounds like he wanted a quick stop on their funds and the AT laws allow that, shouldn't he have gone down the political path and talked to Iceland when they 'illegaly' held onto our money.
Typical UK Government, wanting a quick fix instead of actually looking at the problem of wasting money hand over fist at dole scroungers , benefit cheats and health service tourists they want to seize funds instead of looking at the root cause. It's like putting a plaster on a severed limb, or putting a post-it note over a hole in the hull of a battlseship and hoping the ship doesn't sink in the meantime.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 2 days ago with 74 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 14 days ago with 37 member flags