 |
reply posted on 27-3-2004 @ 04:04 PM by Lampyridae
|
Splashh!! Yeah, I'm about 1 minute behind.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2004 @ 04:04 PM by pyxsul
|
Originally posted by Lampyridae
Splashh!! Yeah, I'm about 1 minute behind. 
Hahah yeah, I had that exact same problem. I had a friend watching it and he was 1 minute ahead
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2004 @ 04:06 PM by Lampyridae
|
No point having an SR-71 chase it. That Pegasus hit Mach 1 almost as soon as it lit its booster. Haha, now somebody's radio on the B-52 is acting up
- "I can take of my mask and yell at him..."
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2004 @ 04:07 PM by dangermouse
|
Maybe it was and it's classified. I doubt it, but this is a conspiracy board.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2004 @ 04:08 PM by ShadowMan
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2004 @ 04:12 PM by Lampyridae
|
Hey, I remember Dangermouse! It was awesome. Nah, why bothersecretly monitoring a NASA mission that's got telemetry coming out of its ears and not a
Martian city, Face or fossil in sight.  Would be more fun if there was something conspiracy-y about it, though...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2004 @ 04:12 PM by PARALYZ
|
Could it have been possible to put a cam on the Pegasus booster and watch the X-43 separate from it or would that have disrupted the aerodynamics?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2004 @ 04:13 PM by Zion Mainframe
|
I put up an ATSNN news story:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2004 @ 04:13 PM by kinglizard
|
Your photo isn't showing up.
[Edited on 27-3-2004 by kinglizard]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2004 @ 04:15 PM by Lampyridae
|
PARALYZ: No real point - just more wires, cables, radio freqs etc. Plus the camera has to stand up to Mach 5 airflow. They did mount cameras on a lot
of the early rockets, showing stage separation, but I think that was mainly to see if they had a clean separation, nothing that would interfere with
the flight later on.
Well, I'm going to hit the sack. That was fun. Cheers, guys.
[Edited on 27-3-2004 by Lampyridae]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2004 @ 04:21 PM by ShadowMan
|
Sorry King and everyone else, here it is click the link
www.villagephotos.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2004 @ 11:01 AM by Nans DESMICHELS
|
I saw on TV news that this plane beat the speed record with a speed of more than mach 8 for a few seconds.
Congrats !
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2004 @ 01:50 PM by vorazechul
|
and I heard on the news that it reached "only" mach7 with about 7700 km/h
Now I read somewhere on ATS that there was some data lost or something like that and I would like to know what the real spead was......some help
please
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2004 @ 02:18 PM by Lampyridae
|
Would have been tracked on radar, so they'd have a pretty good idea on speed. I think the data started beiing lost after the scramjet shut down.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2004 @ 03:46 PM by Laxpla
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |