as I feared, there has been subsequent caselaw that appears to overrule the decision in Daly...
first they discount Justice Mahoney's jurisdiction:
Martin V. Mahoney was a justice of the peace in Scott County, Minnesota in the 1960s. The 1967/1968 Minnesota Legislative Manual states:
"Justices of the peace are elected for two-year terms in townships and in cities and villages which do not have municipal courts. Justices of the
peace have jurisdiction over actions arising within a county when the amount involved does not exceed $100 for civil cases, and when the punishment or
fine does not exceed $100 or three months' imprisonment in criminal cases."
Because the decisions of these justice of the peace courts are not precedential (that is, other courts do not have to follow them), they are not
published.
**********************
Then the corrupt courts do their best to overrule:
Related litigation did produce published decisions from the Minnesota Supreme Court. In Re Jerome Daly, 284 Minn.567, 171 N.W.2d 818 (1969), is
excerpted below:
On July 11, 1969, Mr. Justice C. Donald Peterson, acting for the Minnesota Supreme Court, directed Martin V. Mahoney, justice of the peace of
Credit River Township, Scott County, Minnesota, and Jerome Daly, counsel for plaintiff in an action brought by one Leo Zurn against one Roger D.
Derrick and the Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis, to show cause why they should not be permanently restrained from further proceedings in the
justice court. In addition, Justice Peterson ordered a stay of all further proceedings before the justice of the peace pending final determination of
the questions raised by Northwestern National Bank's petition for writ of prohibition.
Although the stay order of Justice Peterson was served on the justice of the peace and Mr. Daly on July 11, 1969, they intentionally and
deliberately disregarded it in this way: On July 14, 1969, the justice of the peace, upon motion of Mr. Daly, entered findings of fact, conclusions of
law, and an order for judgment in favor of Zurn. In response to our order of August 12, 1969, directing the justice of the peace and Mr. Daly to show
cause why they should not be held in constructive contempt of the Supreme Court of Minnesota for this conduct, Mr. Daly appeared personally in his own
behalf before this court on August 21. He advised the court that he had been authorized to represent the justice of the peace in the proceedings.
After noting that he was making a special appearance, Mr. Daly, an attorney at law admitted to practice in this state, acknowledged that both he and
the justice of the peace intentionally violated the order of Justice Peterson because in their opinion neither this court nor Justice Peterson had
jurisdiction to issue it.
Although the death of the justice of the peace on August 22, 1969, has rendered the proceedings as against him moot, it is our judgment that the
conduct of Jerome Daly was contumacious. It is the order of this court that he be temporarily suspended from the practice of law in the courts of this
state effective October 1, 1969.
*******************
The file for this case has been scanned and the documents are available at
www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us...
*******************
Perhaps a challenge could be made to this "new" caselaw?