reply to post by fleabit
Well if the banks and lending institutions weren't telling the "people" that they could afford them or approve them for loans that they clearly
couldn't afford . . . we wouldn't be admonishing these damn theiving "people" anyway. This article was about a renter, by the way, not a lazy
loan dodger.
I'm totally behind holding someone responsible for their actions, but if the bank tells me I've been approved for $X and I can afford it . . . then
the economy gets worse and I can't or I can't over time because the bank had no business lending me the money in first place . . . who is to
blame?
Plus everyone seems to be just glazing over the fact that the courts have already ruled against the lawfulness of the practice of foreclosure . . .
show me any court case that overturns this and I'd gladly listen to the typical "lazy shift-about" v. personal responsiblity argument. Until then,
the point is moot because banks don't have the "right" to foreclose or seize your property.
1969 Credit River v. Daly