A lot of people are expecting a one-world government, but I think what were going to get instead is just a one-world currency. No need for one government if you can control everything with one currency. Think about it... The Euro has yet to be adopted by the British people, who so far refuse to give up their precious pound. So, to get the whole world to accept a new currency, why not debase the value of all existing currencies so that people we will be happy to accept a new currency that does have some exchange value?

[edit on 15-1-2009 by Rumpelstiltskin]

[edit on 16-1-2009 by Rumpelstiltskin]

Originally posted by Rumpelstiltskin
A lot of people are expecting a one-world government, but I think what were going to get instead is just a one-world currency. No need for one government if you can control everything with one currency. Think about it... The Euro has yet to be adopted by the British people, who so far refuse to give up their precious pound. So, to get the whole world to accept a new currency, why not debase the value of all existing currencies so far down that people we will be happy to accept a new currency that does have some exchange value?

[edit on 15-1-2009 by Rumpelstiltskin]

Also Denmark and Sweden has refused euro and Germany wants to go back to Deutschmark.

Too bad we couldn't get Ron Paul's take on the article. It is an interesting idea, makes you wonder. Even if its wrong in its premise, it still gives an idea what the effects might be from the Fed's actions.

Who are these people, why haven't others caught on to this?

What is so complex that these fools could get away with this? Is there no true good soul left in american power?

Originally posted by AceOfAces
Who are these people?

They are the private owners of the U.S. Federal Reserve, part of a network of families that own or control almost every central bank in the world. Someone once aptly called this group the "cartel of cartels." Family names like Rothschild, Dupont, Warburg, Rockefeller, Harriman. I think the Bush family holds shares in the Fed, but they are more like front desk clerks compared to the bigger names. Here's a good question: Why do people think Bill Gates is the richest man in the world when he has less than $100 billion to his name? Because all we ever get to see are lists of the richest individuals, not families. Some of these families have to be trillionaires. Think about it... $500 trillion of wealth in the world (by some estimates). Meanwhile, the two 'supposedly' richest guys in the world, Buffet And Gates, control less than $200 billion between them! Where is the other $499.8 trillion? In our pockets? Huh! The average person is in debt up to their ears. So is the average business and government. So, who owns everything? The creditors. Napoleon didn't want their credit because, as he put it so very well, "The hand that gives is above the hand that takes."

Originally posted by AceOfAces
Why haven't others caught on to this? Is there no true good soul left in american power?

The coddled-classes are not about to start a revolution for us. They are more concerned with moving up within the existing system, or just afraid of moving down. The revolution will have to begin from below.



[edit on 16-1-2009 by Rumpelstiltskin]

[edit on 16-1-2009 by Rumpelstiltskin]

Originally posted by turbokid
seems the plan is to crash the system and pick up all the pieces at firesale prices.
when you are as wealthy as the fed bankers, the goal isnt money anymore, its power.

Well, there's no point expressing my opinion, you have done it for me.

When you have enough money to have whatever you desire in the world, why would you want more?

Now that is a truth. We think that this land is not in the game. The truth is they have been trying to sell this land from under us. We may be just crying about what naturally goes on in business. Bought , real cheap from indians and sold for tremendous profit to the highest bidder. Your home your land protected by the constitution means your property can be sold by the government.

Okay so the FED has printed out trillions of dollars and injected even more electronic monies into the system.
But wait a second NO ONE HAS ANY MONEY! So where exactly is it all? That is the question you are not touching on.
Funny thing is the money is there and its being used to buy up what ever the bankers don't already control and shut down what "they" don't feel anyone needs. This happens like every 50 years or so, only this time it isn't just a consolidation its a complete worldwide take over. There isn't a government in any country that's not being put in their place by these people. They have all the money and all the control they need. THEY now run the show.
Get ready for the ride of your life because what they have been putting in place for years is going to send every economy worldwide into a tailspin sooner than later.
The USA was simply waiting till they got the new prez in before they started shooting off about just how many states, banks and companies are done or have already gone under. California was supposed to wait till Jan 31 before shooting off at the mouth. But no matter they already had all the protection in place to quell any dissent and rioting.

i think the answer is an absolute yes ,the fed has been hijacked by manevolent forces who have used it to topple the economic systems of the world time and time again.
they print money like their on a mission....at the beggining of the bush term interest rates were lowered to nothing...the result was a borrowing spree financed by said printing that lead to an unsustainible bubble,now to get out of the collapsing bubble they are printing even more money....the result is a collapsing dollar and commodity value,the more they print the greater the collapse.

its evident the fed cannot be trusted with the economic power they have...instead it should be split up and run by real economists and not POLITICiANS.

I'm not sure that the fed has been hijacked, more that it was designed with this in mind. Consolidation of power through money manipulation.

A couple of questions for the experts on this board:
The way I understand the stock market, all this money that has been lost is not real money. It doesn't become "real" unless the stock is sold at the lower price. then it is locked in and the loss is the difference between the price at which it was bought and where it was sold. So is the money being created by the fed any more real than those stock market losses if the stock is unsold?

Have they given up the notion of borrowing money from China that we must repay with interest? Is this real money or digits on a computer? There is not the slightest chance this money will ever be repaid let alone the interest so what is it that china owns, literally owns--our government? the stock the government has scooped up from the banks and automakers? the land under our feet? or doesn't china expect collateral for loans?

Originally posted by earlywatcher


Have they given up the notion of borrowing money from China that we must repay with interest? Is this real money or digits on a computer? There is not the slightest chance this money will ever be repaid let alone the interest so what is it that china owns, literally owns--our government? the stock the government has scooped up from the banks and automakers? the land under our feet? or doesn't china expect collateral for loans?

When your money oriented money is no option. China's financial grip on america assures them control over eastern imperialistic diplomacy. Plus a trade pact, and aid should any other foreign country decide to invade china. We are financial security.

I would like to know why we as apeople have not purchased back the Federal reserve for the price listed in its charter.

Thed first thing I would do is outlaw fractional lending altogether is that counterfiting?