That's your response? More childish insults and ignoring the facts and questions thrown at you?

Nice try kid.

[edit on 7-10-2008 by scotty18]

definitely frame rate...

you've seen in many car commercials the wheels look like they're going backwards?

now, i do agree that the video is amazing. it really does trick the eye!

it was probably shot HD, and not film that tends to blur more.

The person that made this video did so with the goal of fooling the viewer. The rotor is moving with the aircraft which provides a dramatic effect. Standard videography should not do this at a constant frame-rate. Thus the producer must have had a high framerate source and massaged the frame-rate throughout the entire video so that the blade position correlated with the aircraft and gravity on the output.

Obsidience

As much as this illusion is believable, that is what it is, an illusion as stated before. If you listen to the audio you can hear the engine, and the blades cutting threw the air. If it had no audio it would have been even more believable.

Great find to the OP.

[edit on 8-10-2008 by All Seeing Eye]

Originally posted by truthwarrior7
I don't believe the "frame rate" lie!

This is anti-Gravity. Thee is no way to slow down the frame rate to make it appear that the rotors aren't moving.

Good luck reproducing this for us all, "debunkers".

The entire term "debunker" implies that you are breaking aprt the illusions to get to the truth.

However, many so called "debunkers" these days are government agents, debunking legitimate conspiracies.

The frame-rate argument is for dummies.

How can some people be so ignorant? This is as plain as day.
Example: swing a jump rope at a constant rate in front of you, now time it carefully and keep the pace steady, start blinking your eyes as the rope would be reaching the bottom of the swing, and open them as it comes up in front of you..
OMGz the rope is staying at one place but you're sure that your swinging it!

On a serious note, High speed cameras can capture objects at 40,000fps.
Thats forty thousand images for each second of time passing.
Now if a rotor is spinning at a typical rate, say 500rpm as in a Scorpion, you simply slow the capture rate by 0.0125, and suprise! The blade has stopped.
The rear rotor turns at a very different and non constant rate, so as expected, it continues to move (just like in the video)

Do this if you're in the US and have 60hz electric power, get a box fan, turn it on low and look through it, past the blades, to the other side at a lamp.
Suprise again! The blades are appearing to move slower. This has so many examples that its not even worth listing them all.
And another thing, did anyone turn the volume up and listen to the obvious noise of the blades?
I don't mean to offend by this post but it aggervates me when someone goes off and calls BS/governmentworker/debunker when it only takes common since and a small understanding to the working of electronics to plainly see this.

Originally posted by scotty18
Ok, truthwarrior7, explain to me the video of my father in law flying in a prop plane with a cockpit video and the lone prop on the plane not spinning in the video.

Well obviously your father in law has an anti-gravity plane. According to truthwarrior, or whatever his name is, everyone is in the know and has it except for us weak-minded looooosers.

Havent you ever seen Superman, he has anti-grav. I am pretty sure they even sell it at Wal-Mart. They have an anti-grav trampoline. You just jump on it once and shoot of into outer space. I am going to get my kids one for Christmas.

It would be cool if they did have anti-grav helicopters and then just projected the sound of rotors spinning so that people didnt know we had anti-grav.

[edit on 8-10-2008 by justsomeboreddude]

Another simple and obvious idea.

If it were anti-gravity, it wouldn't need rotors?


*sigh*... I figured that would have been obvious enough for most of you.

And why are they using a 20 something year old helicopter? A Russian one? Unless it's the Russians that have the anti-grav capability? I also agree with Shugo about the presence of the blades in the first place. If it was to cover up the fact that it was an anti-grav, then how'd security lapse so badly that it's now on Youtube? Anyway, neat video and thanks for posting it.

OK, since I haven't read the entire thread I'm going to go ahead and assume that nobody has bothered to ask a very simple and obvious question, so I'll go ahead. Why would a highly advanced anti-gravity system be installed an a Russian gunship that is decades old? Wouldn't there be a special and unique hull design to properly accommodate and effectively utilize this new technology instead of the belly of a Hind? Also, it is difficult to say whether that's an actual Hind gunship or not. For all we know it could be simply be a toy hung up on a string.

But hey, if believing that this is the real deal makes you happy, continue. The phrase, "I want to believe" comes to mind here. lol

[edit on 9-10-2008 by Lucidliving]