Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Um..excuse me but is it me or are the back end blades spinning quite clearly?

whats this frame per resolution crap then?

Originally posted by Shugo
Well, I don't know the workings of camera's, so I don't know about the whole frame rate matter, but I can certainly see rotor motion. There are phases to coming to a conclusion than simply shouting "this is anti-gravity!" All options haven't been exhausted yet -- I for one find the idea of anti-gravity to be complete bollocks, since we don't even have the absolute idea down of gravity as a whole.

This clearly shows that you are not as informed as the rest of us in some of these matters. It is an established, and absolute undisputed FACT, that the government has anti-gravity UFOs and flying disks of all sorts.

I don't mean to sound crude here, but if you don't know about that already, then the idea of anti-gravity helicopters would be like telling a caveman about dvd players.

Originally posted by Shugo
Neutrally speaking, does make you wonder...um.....well...if it "was" anti-gravity, and it "was" put on a helicopter........why are the rotors still on the helicopter in the first place?


In order to cover the fact that it is anti-gravity. If it was an "open project" then there would be no hiding it. The fact that it is Black Op, means they have to continue to hide it, even in front of lower ranking officers. That means take off and landing probably entail the rotors but the main flight gear is magnetic or bottom and side air thrusters. There are projects that are currently using air thrusters for hovercraft vehicles and also being used to test skycars.




[edit on 7-10-2008 by truthwarrior7]