posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 03:49 PM
Because they are pro-war. And they are generally supportive of the fed itself, which is what enables them to feed the war machine. They are also
trying to bait and switch. Bait with something good, then take that and direct it in the opposite way.
Their argument is generally not to get rid of the fed, but to have the fed "act right".
The best system we can have for honest money is where the government issues the money in direct proportion to the amount of assets and such. So they
will try to play the fed off in that light, that if they were doing a good job, we wouldn't be having problems.
What they will probably never mention, and can't get around is - if the value of the money the fed "loans" to use is taken from the existing
wealth, how is it in itself a valid loan? So why do we have to pay the money back, and pay the interest back?
The reason the constitution tied the money to gold and silver was because of this. Because governments are also inclined to create money to give
themselves. It is still taking the value from the existing money(inflation tax). So we could still face the problems of today. But the money
would be more honest, atleast it wouldn't be debt based with interest. And the newly created money for increase in production(natural inflation)
can be used to pay for the basic parts of government, and you won't need to pay income tax.
Which means, we need a society that understands these things and can keep the people we elect in check. And a limited government, rather than
Because the amount of money is based on actual assets, it's no longer a debt based system, but a system based on value.