Evolution stops here: Future Man will look the same, says scientist, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 02:37 PM by Venit
reply to post by lee anoma



Actually it's more proof that evolution is correct. Evolution is basically random mutations that at least do not confer a disadvantage to reproduction. If there is a mutational defect then that genetic trait dies out, but if there is a mutational advantage, then that becomes dominant. However, since we are basically able to keep most babies alive whatever mutations they are born with, then they cancel each other out. Ergo we no longer see new traits because there's no longer an environment in which they matter.


reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 09:34 PM by johnsky
I have to disagree with this guy.

There are a few points of which we know we are evolving along.

1: The fifth fingers and toes are being de-evolved. Eventually future generations will be born completely devoid of pinky fingers and pinky toes.

2: Hair is still de-evolving. Future humans will have noticeably less hair on their bodies, as well as the head. As have all generational jumps throughout history.

3: Appendix. This part should be obvious to you. We haven't finished de-evolving the appendix yet.

4: Mental capacity. As our environment turns from an environment of hands on dexterity to mental + hand eye coordination, so will our mental capabilities. Unfortunately, our ability to think sternly enough to complete complex math is de-evolving... this has been replaced by aides such as the calculator, etc.

5: Collar bones. Yep, we're losing them... or at least a few families in the world are. In Egypt there are a number of cases of humans with no collarbones. The collar bone was originally a support structure for the upper forward chassis, back when we spent more time on all fours.
Nowadays, all the collar bone does is provides an easily fractured and prone structure, that limits arm movement. Not exactly useful... but damned annoying when damaged.
That is slowly being de-evolved.

6: Height. We're still getting noticeably taller from generation to generation.

7: Eye color. Blue eyes are dying out... though, they were apparently a defect to begin with... if you ask some. I have blue eyes, and don't see how it could be classified as such.

8: Hair color. Red hair is also dying out... as is Blond.

... there are literally hundreds of examples of continuing evolution in the human species alone...


... I fail to see how anyone can make a generalized assumption that we've stopped evolving, when there is so much evidence to the contrary.

I'll just file this opinion with the guys who claim that nothing else can be invented.
Just because you aren't intelligent enough to envision it, doesn't mean it can't be done.
It just means you're not intelligent enough to envision it.


reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 09:55 PM by tdubz
ok i may be way off on this, but this is how I see it. Evolution is animals mutating to take advantage of their surrounding environment. So if a frog one day appeared with webbed feet, this would give him an advantage over frogs without webbed feet. the frog could swim faster to food. It could probably get to female frogs faster to mate, etc. eventually the webbed feet frogs would take over.

Now look at present day man. This is why i feel we have stopped evolving. First point, we have created our own environment. we dont need to evolve to make us better suited. we no longer need hair covering our bodies to keep us warm or protect us from the sun. We have houses now with heaters for warmth and air conditioning to keep us cool. we have clothing to protect us from the sun. we dont need strong legs or strong lungs because we have cars to drive us every where. there are several examples like this but ill stop with those. heres my point. we have come to a point in mankind where we no longer need evolution to help us survive. we can change our surroundings to fit our needs now.

second point. If there was a mutation that could be advantageous to the human race, would anyone really allow it? we as a species are so obsessed with appearance that anything different from the norm is looked down on. For example, lets say that i was born with a third eye on the back of my head. this could be a huge advantage for me over others. I could see my enemies or predators coming up from behind me so i could have plenty of time to escape where as others would not. I would definitely have an advantage. But what are the chances of me reproducing? Im pretty sure i would be hard pressed to find some one to be with. every woman would more than likely be embarrassed to be seen with a person with a third eye, and would be afraid to pass it on to their kids. so in essence, evolution will stop for mankind due to our own fear of being different.


reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 10:10 PM by rapinbatsisaltherage
reply to post by lee anoma



What we lack in natural evolution will be made up for us with technology. This in no way will slow us down or prohibit our ability to be much more than what we are now. Think of how technology has affected us in the last thirty years? Now image the same progressiveness happening every thirty years for a million more years?

[edit on 7-10-2008 by rapinbatsisaltherage]


reply posted on 8-10-2008 @ 12:42 AM by NorthWolfe CND
reply to post by lee anoma



I agree that, as a biological being, man's evolution has come to an end, mainly due to technology making any major evolution redundant. However, that same technology is part of the nest Great Human Evolution, the integration between man and machine. Such evolution is already a reality, specially in the replacement of defected or severed "parts"; we are now, or have been for the past decade, entering a "Brave New World" of technology improving the brain...

The biological evolution of the brain, as you stated, would be almost impossible due to the high penalty we would have to face, the brains huge consumption of energy (currently ~73% of the total energy consumed by our bodies)...

Humans have "chosen" technology and I think that is where the future will take our evolution. The perfect symbiosis between Man and Machine...




reply posted on 8-10-2008 @ 10:18 AM by whitewave
Originally posted by Venit
reply to
post by lee anoma


since we are basically able to keep most babies alive whatever mutations they are born with, then they cancel each other out. Ergo we no longer see new traits because there's no longer an environment in which they matter.


That logic only applies in civilized countries and then only to those who can afford appropriate healthcare.

On a side note, how convenient that we can stop looking for signs of evolution in humans. Might as well give up looking for that missing link too.



reply posted on 8-10-2008 @ 01:13 PM by amazed
reply to post by 44soulslayer




Well, I am not sure about this one, my daughter has an IQ in the top 5% of the population, she likes her guys "dumber" than she is, oh much "dumber". Though she is 15. But then again, maybe she is on to something LOL.


Also, many men who are very intelligent, like women who are less intelligent, as they can then "control" the relationship. So I am not so sure about your ideas here, that intelligent people only choose intelligent people and stupid people only choose stupid people. I think the situation is far more complex that this.

I also do not agree that "evolution" has stopped, because every single day we have new things we are "adapting" to. Maybe our physical appearance evolutionary stage has slowed/stopped but not our emotional or spiritual or intellectual evolution.

I also think that when we do make it into "space" on a large scale, that this will "kick off" some forms of evolution physically that will not take place while on earth. To me this will also continue if we ever populate other planets, and humans will begin to evolve to adapt to the new planet that they have populated.

We only use a small portion of our brains, and I do see a future where we learn to tap into more and more of the parts we are not utilizing as of now. I think this would be happening at a faster pace if we did not have so many harmful chemicals in our bodies ie: poisons in the environment, food, water. I also think (physically) these chemicals that are invading our everyday lives will in the end show that some form of adaptation will have to take place. Those that adapt survive, those that don't die off (cancers etc.). So the chemicals in our lives are to me "slowing" our brains down, but will "kick off" some form of physical adaptation.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags