Forget Sunburn - enter the new carrier killer

reply to post by C0bzz


to reply in the tone as you

did you even READ the first post? or just launch into your full of fail uneducated ex-covict cause im from failand of australia response?

as i linked in the FIRST POST mr fail is that many countries can produce BALLISTIC warheads that can MANEUVER , russia have them , the usa have them , as i linked from the pershing 2 - but reading comprehension is just fail for you.

*sigh* what an amazing ability to just ignore whats been posted on pages 1 >4 ; the tech is available and just because the usa doesn`t persue it doesn`t mean its to be dismissed out of hand

reply to post by 121200


Let me ask you something,

Is this entire thread not about an anti-ship missile?

I'm not trying to say that a well-orchestrated assault can't cause significant damage to a carrier, I'm trying to say that it's going to take a lot more than a single torpedo, anti-ship missile, and what-not to sink a carrier.

If you haven't noticed, some members in this thread seem to be convinced that all it takes is one.

Shattered OUT...

Please explain, for I see a sea skimming 200kilo-tone nuke doing it just fine,

Reminder:

The title of this thread is: Forget Sunburn - Enter The New Carrier Killer

Please remain on topic, and feel free to start a new thread in the appropriate forum if you feel there is a new subject that needs to be discussed so that this one can run its course.

Carry on and thanks.

reply to post by 121200


Ok, if you can get a 200 kiloton nuclear warhead into the missile in-question and at the same time get that missile to make it through the many layered defenses of a CBG, then I'll give it up to you, the carrier is sinkable...

Shattered OUT...

Regardless, the 'nuke' argument is both an easy way out, and an uneducated response. To be more specific:

If you nuke a carrier group, you've suddenly escalated the level of the game to 'Armageddon'. A nuclear device in that case should be considered more of a game-changer, than of a tool to remove the battle-group. What such a thing would mean is not so much that a carrier sank, but that the country whom launched the missile will shortly thereafter be radioactive, whether a controlled response or all-out.

And really, that's the reason countries develop Sunburn, Brahmos..
So they don't have to use nukes.

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to