Please explain, for I see a sea skimming 200kilo-tone nuke doing it just fine,

Reminder:

The title of this thread is: Forget Sunburn - Enter The New Carrier Killer

Please remain on topic, and feel free to start a new thread in the appropriate forum if you feel there is a new subject that needs to be discussed so that this one can run its course.

Carry on and thanks.

Regardless, the 'nuke' argument is both an easy way out, and an uneducated response. To be more specific:

If you nuke a carrier group, you've suddenly escalated the level of the game to 'Armageddon'. A nuclear device in that case should be considered more of a game-changer, than of a tool to remove the battle-group. What such a thing would mean is not so much that a carrier sank, but that the country whom launched the missile will shortly thereafter be radioactive, whether a controlled response or all-out.

And really, that's the reason countries develop Sunburn, Brahmos..
So they don't have to use nukes.

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to

wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to