It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Forget Sunburn - enter the new carrier killer

page: 6
0
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 15 2008 @ 07:44 AM
link   
reply to post by C0bzz
 


to reply in the tone as you

did you even READ the first post? or just launch into your full of fail uneducated ex-covict cause im from failand of australia response?

as i linked in the FIRST POST mr fail is that many countries can produce BALLISTIC warheads that can MANEUVER , russia have them , the usa have them , as i linked from the pershing 2 - but reading comprehension is just fail for you.

*sigh* what an amazing ability to just ignore whats been posted on pages 1 >4 ; the tech is available and just because the usa doesn`t persue it doesn`t mean its to be dismissed out of hand




posted on Dec, 15 2008 @ 09:29 AM
link   
reply to post by 121200
 


Let me ask you something,

Is this entire thread not about an anti-ship missile?

I'm not trying to say that a well-orchestrated assault can't cause significant damage to a carrier, I'm trying to say that it's going to take a lot more than a single torpedo, anti-ship missile, and what-not to sink a carrier.

If you haven't noticed, some members in this thread seem to be convinced that all it takes is one.

Shattered OUT...



posted on Dec, 15 2008 @ 12:29 PM
link   
Please explain, for I see a sea skimming 200kilo-tone nuke doing it just fine,



posted on Dec, 15 2008 @ 01:41 PM
link   

Reminder:



The title of this thread is: Forget Sunburn - Enter The New Carrier Killer

Please remain on topic, and feel free to start a new thread in the appropriate forum if you feel there is a new subject that needs to be discussed so that this one can run its course.

Carry on and thanks.



posted on Dec, 15 2008 @ 06:29 PM
link   
reply to post by 121200
 


Ok, if you can get a 200 kiloton nuclear warhead into the missile in-question and at the same time get that missile to make it through the many layered defenses of a CBG, then I'll give it up to you, the carrier is sinkable...

Shattered OUT...



posted on Dec, 15 2008 @ 08:17 PM
link   
Regardless, the 'nuke' argument is both an easy way out, and an uneducated response. To be more specific:

If you nuke a carrier group, you've suddenly escalated the level of the game to 'Armageddon'. A nuclear device in that case should be considered more of a game-changer, than of a tool to remove the battle-group. What such a thing would mean is not so much that a carrier sank, but that the country whom launched the missile will shortly thereafter be radioactive, whether a controlled response or all-out.

And really, that's the reason countries develop Sunburn, Brahmos..
So they don't have to use nukes.



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to



posted on Jun, 20 2009 @ 01:40 AM
link   
wo thanks for the info i wish i could post a new thread i neeeed to




top topics



 
0
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join