Originally posted by smallpeeps
Its a vision she had, its symbolic. No, I don't think heaven is all about mud huts, she simply dreamed of times past, when Christ worship
began.
Symbolic? No, she said she saw heaven. Mudbrick huts and all. You are doing what all religious types do when someone speaks up and says "isn't
that a bit odd?" - you change the goalposts.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Your tone displays clearly your alignment. I believe you'll get that super-heaven you are hoping for, so keep your faith intact.
Neutral-Evil, by D&D reckoning.
Just what do you believe this for? What do you base it on? Your own mother claims to have seen heaven, and it is nothing like the myths say it is -
why do you somehow believe that there might be one that is?
Originally posted by smallpeeps
It's fine that you think so, but you'll be wasting your time in this thread, and I hope a mod will remove you if you plan to use this thread to
debunk Jesus because there's enough folks engaged in that elsewhere.
Well, it's not really what I think, it's just what the archeological evidence suggests. I can't contradict it, I'd feel like a fool.
I don't doubt plenty of people were called Jesus (Yeshua) and plenty of them probably had a bit of wise-man mystique around them. Apollinus was
another wandering miracleworker.
Now, I have to ask, aren't you slightly disturbed by some of the imagery she was coming out with? I mean, seriously, gibbering angels, cherubs who
didn't particularly seem to like her, the weird, foreboding cocoons that would entrap you forever, the field and room of blood, etc.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
No, I instead, pity your lack of vision.
My lack of vision? I might not have your kind of "vision", but I can see a woman who is clearly distressed by what she has seen. She didn't have
a great time the whole way, much of it she was scared. Being able to describe any aspect of Heaven as "devilish" is unbelieveably creepy.
Originally posted by smallpeepsThe room full of blood she saw, which she and others in robes were on their knees cleaning, was possibly
symbolic of the blood which has been shed by the lovers of the dead-crucified christ.
No no no, it is "possibly symbolic" of God's thirst for human blood, by the gallon, to drive his internal engine of destruction to finally
obliterate every other god in existence, so that, like Highlander, he is the only one left.
My point is, if you think yours is valid you
have to think mine is valid because they are based on the same thing: guesswork. Neither one has
anything to suggest or deny it, so both are equally possible.
Originally posted by smallpeepsThey NEED blood and they NEED a blood sacrifice,
Let's step back a second here.
You're saying God, his angels, Jesus, whatever is actually in NEED of blood? However can you justify that to yourself? You don't find that to be so
terribly macabre, combined with Satan being the Great Deceiver, to lead you to think you might be being lied to?
Oh let's read on...
Originally posted by smallpeepsand surely that fact, though veiled today, will be part of what the fulfillment of Christ worship is.
The understanding of the blood ritual is not discussed on Earth today, because it might interfere with all the blood being shed today.
...and you're getting this from where? What compelled you to create this fantastical explanation in your mind? Because I doubt you read this in the
Bible (having read it cover-to-cover multiple times, I know you didn't).
You are using plenty of words like "possibly" and "might" - you don't know. You've made it clear you don't know because of all the wishy-washy
"maybe"s. So why not just say "Hey, I'll be honest with you, I don't have a clue"?
Originally posted by smallpeepsYou've made your views clear here, and I understand you feel Jesus was just a fake,
I honestly think he was just seriously misquoted.
Originally posted by smallpeepsbut really there are many people who do not think that's true, so can you please allow this thread to
exist without your input? You'll find no shortage of Jesus-disbelievers all over ATS and they have lots of threads where you can all laugh at the
idea of a faithful person being given a vision of truth.
Unfortunately I apparently can't stay out...
My problem is the willful propagation of ignorance. Against all the evidence (a Satanic-sounding Heaven) you have decided to make blase assumptions
that you assume to be true on absolutely nothing at all. I can't stand idly by and let you think such ridiculous things, because what kind of man
would I be if I were to allow others to wallow in darkness while I was the only one reading by a light?
If this was some message or vision from God, doesn't it disturb you that there are people who just don't think so? I mean, surely God would be able
to make me believe simply by saying "I AM!" with a thunderclap, and I'd say "You are!" and sit down and shut the fark up? What if the being you
think is communicating this vision doesn't have that kind of power, so he has to resort to tricks and subtleties to try and blag people over to his
point of view?
Basically your arguments are not based on sound logic, even if one were to accept the premise that your mother was seeing
some kind of
afterlife.