|
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 08:39 AM by whatsup
|
Hmm, GW and Cheney weren't mentioned on this list and they are the clear terrorists! Seems to me though that McCain has been seen a time or two with
these delightful tyrants.
[edit on 6-10-2008 by whatsup]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 08:39 AM by theodorej
|
reply to post by whatsup
Greetings .....Perhaps....However the consequences could be catastrophic should the closet be opened and all the skeletons are aired...Starting with
Acorn,Freddie Mac and a cast of supporters that try to stay out of the sunlight...If the McCain campaighn would rid themselves of this
cowardly,politically correct posture and start naming names they could win this election...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 08:41 AM by stinkhorn
|
reply to post by whatsup
Hannity and Limbaugh are not news, the are entertainment commentators, FOX news is completely different then commentation. Learn the difference.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 08:42 AM by Fromabove
|

Originally posted by Frankidealist35
They're running a smear campaign against Barack Obama. They're trying to paint him as a terrorist with radicalist ties. This is nothing but
propaganda made up by Rupord Murdoch to support the GOP.
If you're watching TV do not watch Fox News.
They are putting out the same kind of bs again and again.
Don't let fox brainwash you. Don't just watch fox news for fun. DO NOT WATCH IT AT ALL.
Get real. Look at all the cool aid "tingle up my leg" liberal news networks who mislead the American people every day About John McCain. Foxnews is
telling the true life story about the anti-American, socialist, biggoted Barack Hussein Obama.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 08:42 AM by scientist
|
Originally posted by whatsup
the Obama campaign will not touch Palin with a 10 foot pole. They know better than to even mention "the delicate genius" for fear of inciting a
female persecution backlash of immense proportion. Of course, she was picked by design for this very purpose of remaining untouchable. She can "put
on her heels and take off her gloves" all day long and remain fairly invulnerable.
I believe that the Obama campaign will address Palin once she says something worthy of being acknowledged. So far, that hasn't happened. I feel
that Biden even acknowledging her presence at the debate was nothing more than a polite formality.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 08:46 AM by coastlinekid
|
All of the corporate media outlets are biased, but FOX is by far the worst...
video.google.com...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 08:52 AM by justsomeboreddude
|
 
Originally posted by coastlinekid
All of the corporate media outlets are biased, but FOX is by far the worst...
video.google.com...
Oh come on. Have you ever watched MSNBC. They dont even try to disguise it. So if you think Fox is biased to you at least agree that MSNBC is
biased?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 08:52 AM by spaznational
|
  
He's not personally a terrorist but he DOES have radicallist ties. Barak Obama needs to be smeared. He is dangerous to the health of our nation.
You're making me WANT to watch Fox News! (Now all's I needs is a TV.) It would be great to see some news coverage that doesn't totally kiss
Obama's ass.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 08:53 AM by whatsup
|
reply to post by stinkhorn
Hannity and Limbaugh are not news, the are entertainment commentators, FOX news is completely different then commentation. Learn the difference.
No, more correctly it is those who take every word of theirs as "gospel" which need to learn the difference (and trust me, millions do!). I
certainly know the difference, but like I said, this stuff is like "mother's milk" to those with weak minds. BTW, most of Fox is nothing more than
commentation disguised as news.
[edit on 6-10-2008 by whatsup]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 08:59 AM by theodorej
|
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 09:04 AM by 22-250
|
Google Ruperd Murdocks (SP) war on the media , watch it and then tell me you will still watch Fox news channel.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 09:11 AM by theodorej
|
reply to post by phinubian
I agree, the unfortunate quagmire we all faced with is to make a choice between two bad candidates.....It will take six years to clean out that bunch
of lying tricksters in DC....This is the only plan that could work...A state senator has an election every 6 year,within that period there are three
house elections 2 years and one presidential election 4 years....If for a period of six years the american people (majority) voted with this slogan
"Whoever is in is out"we will have been able to give Washington an enima...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 09:12 AM by feydrautha
|
 
the brainwashing is perpetrated by the MSM that chooses to ignore obamas close associations.
why have the MSM ignored all the very real and questionable alliances obama has?
that is propaganda, obama and bill ayers worked very closely.
doesnt obama associate with anyone but dangerous radicals?
this is the guy we want in charge?
Obama Pal Bill Ayers Stomps on Old Glory
Here's a shot of Obama's friend Bill Ayers, the guy at whose house his political career was launched:
You might recognize the flag under his feet: it's ours. The picture is from 2001, when Ayers was serving on the board of the Woods Fund with Obama.
He gave $200 to Obama's State Senate campaign fund that year, and in the September 11 New York Times announced,
I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do enough.
Ayers was extensively involved in terrorist activity directed against the USA, but got off on a technicality and is now a revered figure in the
education establishment. His views do not seem to have changed.
Despite being a member of Barack Obama's circle, Ayers actually has something nice to say about America:
Guilty as sin, free as a bird, it's a great country.
If the MSM is able to install his colleague Obama in the White House, it will soon be an even greater country for those who hate it, though
significantly less great for the rest of us.
Artice:
Bill Ayers
Leader of the 1960s and 70s domestic terrorist group Weatherman
“Kill all the rich people. ... Bring the revolution home. Kill your parents.”
Participated in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, of the Capitol building in 1971, and the Pentagon in 1972
Currently a professor of education at the University of Illinois
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 09:22 AM by theodorej
|
Originally posted by scientist
Originally posted by whatsup
the Obama campaign will not touch Palin with a 10 foot pole. They know better than to even mention "the delicate genius" for fear of inciting a
female persecution backlash of immense proportion. Of course, she was picked by design for this very purpose of remaining untouchable. She can "put
on her heels and take off her gloves" all day long and remain fairly invulnerable.
I believe that the Obama campaign will address Palin once she says something worthy of being acknowledged. So far, that hasn't happened. I feel
that Biden even acknowledging her presence at the debate was nothing more than a polite formality.
Sarah Palin has the courage of her convictions....and once the cowardly politically correct campaign managers step aside we will see and hear an
airing of truth with respect to exactly who Mr.Obama really is and who his freinds are..and after that if he still prevails then the will of people
has spoken and hail to the chief....Lets Look at Acorn,Freddie Mac,Fannie Mae and all the democratic influence since the end of the Clinton Admin with
respect to Government intervention with respect to pressure to write mortgages to people whose only qualification was they were a minority and while
we are at it lets look at Mr. Raines tenure at Freddie Mac and his style of management....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 09:42 AM by Skelkie3
|
Well, why the hell would anybody turn on Fox News ?
I haven 't watched TV ( except in bars and airports ) since the mid eighties.
However, the only radio station I get out here in the boondocks has Alan Weiner ( Michael Savage ) and others for excellent coverage of world and
national events.
Ahhh... come to think of it- I don 't listen to radio these days, either.
Does this make me smarter or more sane than anyone else ? No.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 09:49 AM by theodorej
|
Originally posted by Skelkie3
Well, why the hell would anybody turn on Fox News ?
I haven 't watched TV ( except in bars and airports ) since the mid eighties.
However, the only radio station I get out here in the boondocks has Alan Weiner ( Michael Savage ) and others for excellent coverage of world and
national events.
Ahhh... come to think of it- I don 't listen to radio these days, either.
Does this make me smarter or more sane than anyone else ? No.
Well I don't know....Savage and Winner ?? To opportunists !! I can say that,there was time when Savage was a pablum puking liberal...I don't know
about weinner....If these interlectual vandals are your main staple for news and current events....may suggest a short wave radio...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 10:05 AM by hypervigilant
|
If either one of them wins, we the people are going to get screwed. One thing is certain, petroleum jelly is going to be flying off of the shelves.
Better stock up ya'll..
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 10:41 AM by zlots331
|
Man.... I was going to post something clever and adroit until all I saw in the earlier posts was "yes I did". "no you didn't", "yes they did",
"no they didn't".
Lets try some intelligent (sorry my own personal bias rears its head) discussion ( note: I'm sorry again, I'm not talking about you posters that
actually made a point, just the back and forth banter between a few that sounded like something heard on a playground ).
IMHO, when I want the news, I don't go to any single source. I use the internet more than TV most of the time. When I REALLY want a "third" opinion
I turn on the BBC or even Canadian TV ( I live in northern NY). And with all the talk about why does PBS get taxpayer dollars, at least they're not
owned by a single person or corporation that try to spin their version of events. Can ANY news source be biased, sure, either intentionally or
subconsciously. Everybody has an opinion, even newscasters and there are times when their own personal views leak through. Its just a matter of if
that "leak" is a dribble or a torrent.
I had a most unpleasant experience that I will NOT repeat after the first Presidential debate. I caught myself switching back and forth between cousin
Keith and Uncle Bill until I found myself curled up in the fetal position with a pillow over my head, drooling like a fool and with a few tears slowly
trickling down my cheek, muttering "Please make stop, please make it stop".
I get so fed up with negative ads, nationally and locally (they can really get nasty) that I am actually looking forward to Miss Blossom's prediction
for the 14th.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |