It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jenna
Actually the first post that was speaking about the US was asmeone2's first post which was also the first post of the thread after the original post, and mmariebored's fourth post clarified that the thread was about Christians in the U.S. I do agree that it probably should have been clarified in the OP, but I assumed they meant the U.S. when I first started reading the thread...
Originally posted by mmariebored
Nice try. I never once said it was ONLY ATS posters who do this. I said "here in America".
Originally posted by asmeone2
Hey now, I'm not saying those lives are worthless at all.
I'm calling out the people here in America...
Originally posted by TALIN
Yeah,, umm that would help remove the evidence clearskies was right in addition to the apology you owe her.
Originally posted by Jenna
Anyway, back on topic with me. Well, I would like to anyway but the last few pages aren't really on topic either. Mostly just debating on hypocrisy and a stubborn refusal to believe that the thread is about the U.S.
As I have said before, there are a lot of people in the U.S. who see persecution where it does not exist. I don't deny that it is real, or that it does in fact happen to some, but the majority of people who believe they are persecuted against are only seeing what they expect to see. If I believe that people are going to persecute me for my religious beliefs, skin color, age, sexual orientation, job, etc. I will see it where it doesn't exist. People in the U.S. are too sensitive if you ask me.
It reminds me of a line from a movie, which I can't for the life of me remember the title of right now, where a guy, who happens to be white, is on a plane and says something along the lines of "What is wrong with you people?!" A flight marshal, who happens to be black, takes that to mean "what is wrong with you black people" when what is really meant is "what is wrong with you airline people". A small misunderstanding, but a perfect example of someone seeing what they want to see and hearing what they want to hear. The flight marshal in this scene believes that he is persecuted for his race, and thus hears the remark as derogatory, even though it isn't.
Like I have said in several other threads about several other topics, the massive levels of sensitivity of those in the U.S. to the comments of others is all caused by parenting. You tell or show little Timmy that people will persecute him for something, and claim that you are being persecuted or treated badly due to your religion, and little Timmy will grow up seeing it where it doesn't exist. Little Timmy will grow up expecting to be treated badly over his religion, and will only hear things to confirm his expectations. He won't grow up knowing that just cause someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they are treating you badly or that they are persecuting you. Several decades ago the comments that people get all in a rage about now wouldn't have seemed like personal attacks. They may have seemed like uninformed ignorant fools, but people didn't get their feelings hurt as much as they do now. Like I said, parenting.
Originally posted by badmedia
You can wave a cross and talk about Jesus and be in favor of war, which goes directly against his teachings. But if you are against the war, then you are labeled unpatriotic, muslim lover and all sorts of names.
Originally posted by badmedia
I see people arguing over if Jesus was real, and people point out the dogmas, and people point out the bad stuff done in the name of Jesus. But you never see them do so against the teachings of Jesus. The belief is that if it gets people to do that stuff, it's brainwashing and control.
No better way to deceive people. BUT. As the image was never important, the truth will still make it to people. I have friends and they dislike Christians and all that. I tell them they are more christian then they realize, and they are for the most part. Not perfect, but who is?
Originally posted by undo
in addition, when the original theories upon which atheism was founded, arose, they did so without the benefit of archaeology and assumed their research was thorough enough to prove their theories, but it didn't work out that way. now they just ignore the implications of archaeology. it's yet another interesting human foible.
en.wikipedia.org...
Richard Wurmbrand was born in 1909 at Bucharest, as the youngest of four boys in a Jewish family. He lived with his family in Istanbul for a short while; his father died when he was 9, and the Wurmbrands returned to Romania when he was 15.
He married Sabina Oster on October 26, 1936. Wurmbrand and his wife were converted to Christianity in 1938 through the witness of Christian Wolfkes, a Romanian Christian carpenter; they joined the Anglican Mission to the Jews. Wurmbrand was ordained twice - first as an Anglican, then, after World War II, as a Lutheran pastor.
In 1944, when the Soviet Union occupied Romania as the first step to establishing the communist regime, Wurmbrand began a ministry to his Romanian countrymen and to the Red Army soldiers. When the government attempted to control the churches, he immediately began an "underground" ministry to his people. He was arrested on February 29, 1948, while on his way to church services.
Originally posted by Jenna
I'm going to have to disagree with that second line there. I have stated repeatedly here and elsewhere, including out loud in the real world, that I am not now, nor have I ever been, a supporter of this war. There is a difference, to me anyway, between supporting the war and supporting the troops and I can do one without the other. Not once have I ever been called anything for that statement. I also personally know quite a few Christians who feel the same way I do about the war and the troops and none of them have been called or labeled anything for it either.
Originally posted by EricD
This is getting way off topic, but I'm intrigued by your belief that you can only support the troops by working to bring them home.
You wouldn't consider it 'supporting the troops' to organize Girl or Boy Scout troops in letter writing campaigns? Or sending holiday cards, or boxes with cookies or candy? Or organizing fundraisers that pay for body armor? Or working with groups who organize 'welcome home' parties for returning military men and women?
I don't mean to disrespect the op and derail the thread, so feel free to pm me if this is too far off the track of the discussion of Christians believing they are persecuted.
Thanks!
Eric