Originally posted by LowLevelMason
Your response demonstrates the fallacies of this "documentary."
There is no proof or evidence that "greed" is holding back advances in technology. In fact, the proof is just the opposite: greed drives advances in
Yes and no. Any tech that can be used to make more money is advanced. Any tech that can threaten profit is suppressed, like Royal Rife's work, the
Joe Cell, Schauberger's stuff, cures for diseases, etc.
If there was a shadowy cabal of bankers attempting to keep us from advancing for profit, please tell me why we have computers, the internet,
cell phones, or any of the other technological advances of the past 40 years?
Computers enhanced profit in many ways. I am sure you can see why, but if not, let me know and I will ennumerate a few. The internet initially was
seen as harmless, and then VERY profitable (the Dotcom thing?), and now a frightening thing for its ability to spread information far and wide. Free
speach and all that. (Why do you think net neutrality is being attacked overtly and covertly?)
The auto industry is a excellent example of why greed is good. I don't want any company pushing some electric car on me that I don't want.
I'm not going to buy into environmental fascism to have people force me into what type of vehicle I choose to drive. I love my gas driving SUV and
when it dies, I'll buy another one. If you want to drive a matchbox on wheels that's your choice and you can do so - don't force me to do
You really think fossil fuel is bad because of the ENVIRONMENT!?! Ah, geez. It's bad because it's been used as a revenue source, and has led to
unnecessary wars and the deaths of hundreds of thousands - millions, I dare say. Go ahead and support the terrorists (Cheney, et al), but I would
rather move away from them and the wars they push us into harder than the "environmental fascism" you claim is pushing you away from your fossil
And I am not understanding why this makes greed "good." It seems fully nonsequitur. What has greed got to do with this?
The truth of the matter is Z:A is propaganda. There is no free energy solution, and if there was oil companies would jump at it - all of the
methods Z:A talks about can still be owned and sold to consumers.
The truth of the matter is that there IS a free energy solution. Oil companies have no incentive to "jump at it." It makes their oil worthless! I
am aghast that you actually typed that! I'm guessing, based on that, that you don't fully grasp the Universe you live in.
And, in fact, free energy is the solution to a free society. If our homes had a source of free energy, and our cars, we would be far less beholden to
The System. Add robots to till our lands, harvest our food (clean it, prepare it, serve it), and we would lack for very little. We would not have to
pay anyone to heat or cool the house, light the stove, run the washer and the dryer, and the toaster oven, and the lights and the TV and the electric
carving knife. We could get from here to there without paying anyone for the energy to do so.
No, those who like the status quo are suppressing free energy, lest the slaves come up to the standard of living of the Elite, thereby making the
Elite not Elite any longer.
Unfortunately none of them are viable alternatives: wind energy is a LULU item, solar panels are not efficient enough compared to traditional
electric power, tidal current power is in its infancy,
What does it's infancy have to do with its viability? Numerous designs have been made and built even. Where's the issue?
and geothermal is extraordinarily expensive to operate.
And then there's Dark Energy...which the film did not mention, but which the Elites have had access to for quite a while.
Greed is good.
No. No it's not.
Its what drives innovation, and it is what has brought us all of our technological innovations today. There is a reason why you can't name one
technological innovation that was created without someone making a profit of it: without that greedy urge to make a profit, no one would
Necessity and desire drive innovation and invention. Not greed. And the reason that you can't name one technological innovation that was created
without someone making a profit of it is because only those things that made a profit enough for anyone to take notice are the ones you hear about.
But I'm betting there have been some that were suppressed (didn't make a profit) or had too specific an application (and didn't make a profit).
Greed is only something you find in a scarcity-driven model. If there was abundance for all, greed would not exist. But imagination, innovation and
invention would flourish with time set free to think, contemplate, tinker, and so on.
The whole "you vs the elite" is a illusion drawn to make your life easier.
Either you are very naive or a disinfo agent. I'm suspecting the latter.
People want to believe in some evil elite group hell bent to control their lives because it makes it easy to explain their life circumstances
and blame someone else when life doesn't go as they like it. Its fear mongering, and its not based in reality.
No. No I DON'T want to believe that. I have been forced into it by stark evidence. Most people hide from that stark evidence because they, too,
DON'T want to believe that. But I face the evidence.
You, sir, likely have the job of trying to push our collective head back in the sand. This is book of spook rhetoric from start to finish.
All innovation has come because of our monetary system. None of it has come from the environmental communism pushed by Z:A.
Bee Period. Ess Period.ALL innovation has come from a need or desire. It is drawn into the monetary system because there is nowhere else it has to
go. And again, Z:A is NOT Envirocommunism.
It is a TECHNOCRACY.