Gays, medically born Gay? Gays superior to Strieghts?, page 11
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 11-10-2008 @ 03:24 PM by rapinbatsisaltherage
reply to post by SR



That's the problem though it's only a viable option as long as the technology exists.


That is simply not true, I know gay people who have had children completely naturally and been impregnated naturally. Usually it happened before they were willing to admit who they are, but they surely do not need technology to procreate. I have to ask if people who believe these “gay myths” have ever known a gay person.


reply posted on 11-10-2008 @ 04:27 PM by cashlink
reply to post by JaxonRoberts



LOL OMG! A turkey baster, now that is a good one. I have to wonder if straight parents think they have failed, when they find out that their child is gay, or perhaps the parents think they have a bad jean in their family background.
I have never seen a gay person that born from gay parents.
Now this being said, I believe the problem lays with the straight population “not” the gay population. I believe many straight parents are ashamed when they find out their child is gay, so to justify this some use religion to try to per sway their child to turn straight.



reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 03:55 AM by Thewayshemoves
reply to post by TheOracle



Man...I was just about to say something along those lines. It's been observed in koalas in captivity and in the wild, as well as many other animals. It has already been mentioned that some animals can and do change sex, or take on the role of the opposite sex. Just like a straight male in prison can have sex with a male, yet still be a straight male, animals in captivity have been known to do the same thing. In ALL animals (humans included) it is completely hard-wired and inherent to breed. In the lack of the female, the male breeds anyway, even if it's not procreating. There are certain amphibians where in the event there is a lack in the female population, the males will lay fertilized eggs, without the aid of a mate. All the offspring are female. This very effectively ensures that the species will continue. The same mapping, without the means exists in all animals. In the animal world, if the population changes the breeding habits do as well. It makes perfect sense to say that it's a very effective form of population control. Evolution at it's finest. Why not? It works in every other species? Just because we humans have the curse of self-awareness doesn't mean we can change what we are here to do, and that's procreate and spread our kind by any means necessary, just like any other animal. We will continue to kill ourselves and disallow all of ourselves from being able to breed until the population is under control again (or earth takes care of it for us). To those saying that homosexuality is based on parenting, you couldn't be farther from wrong. The Greeks, Romans, and various other ancients viewed homosexuality as a very normal and accepted thing. Also, I'm sure the animals in the zoo that have homosexual moments around breeding seasons can blame their parents as well?


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 03:23 AM by rapinbatsisaltherage
reply to post by Tayesin



The report stated that the majority of children found to be deficient in one chemical at birth grew up to become homosexual by choice.


Could you post any links to this research or links that even mention it? I’d like to find it, and see how it matches up with more recent research.
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Whats your banjo story?
  Music, Posted 27 minutes ago
Greetings and Salutations
  Introductions, Posted 28 minutes ago
Modern Terrorism
  Jokes, Puns, & Pranks, Posted 30 minutes ago
Finally made an account on ATS
  Introductions, Posted 39 minutes ago
Another new one......
  Introductions, Posted 40 minutes ago
Shock analysis. World Exclusive
  Rant, Posted 1 hours ago