It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Teachers should not be prosecuted for having affairs with their sixth formers, a union chief has said. NASUWT general secretary Chris Keates said it was an "anomaly" that a teacher who had sex with a pupil aged over 16 could go on the sex offenders register.
Originally posted by RFBurns
I suppose if the laws of countries have the age of consent lower than 18 is one thing, which only makes the legal part of the issue mute.
But morally, your correct, as is I. A teacher is supposed to be a trusted individual that us parents can rely on to guide our kids onto the right path and us parents have faith that our kids will not be taken advantage of by the very people we put trust in.
As far as the sex offender list deal for your country goes, I dont know a whole lot about the legal system in the UK or how this particular issue would be resolved. This particular teacher my have a legal leg to stand on in this case, but outside of that it is a moral crime and a misuse of trust put into that teacher.
Just because something may be legal, doesnt necessarily mean its right.
Cheers!!!!
Originally posted by mystiq
They're saying in the normal population, since 16 is the age of consent, its not sexual assault for an adult to have relations with a 16 year old, so it seems an anomaly for a teacher to be prosecuted until 18, but if the student was attending a different school, 16 would apply.
Professional conduct, and laws pertaining to sexual offenses are 2 different things. I agree that 16 should apply universally legally for statutory rape, but any teacher goes against the code of conduct, and therefore is morally wrong, for engaging relations with a student at any age, even in college. Doctors and psychiatrists and therapists do as well, no matter what the age. While they don't face criminal charges, their profession has its own methods of punishing offenders of the professional code.
[edit on 5-10-2008 by mystiq]
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
Well, imo as a parent, I hold teachers to a slightly higher caliber of conduct. Automatically one holds a bit of control over you if one is in a position of authority, thus making it easier to abuse the innate trust students are supposed to have in a teacher. So I can see why it is made to be a crime, it could very well be abuse of position coercing a student into sexual relations for grades, or what not. This is why the laws exist.
Originally posted by machinegun_go_go
reply to post by Death_Kron
Hi,
Can I just ask what you mean when you say that you wouldn't dream of having a trust based relationship with a teacher?
As a teacher myself I don't understand where you're coming from on that one.
Do you mean that you don't trust your teachers?
Peace,
MGGG
Originally posted by RFBurns
I suppose if the laws of countries have the age of consent lower than 18 is one thing, which only makes the legal part of the issue mute.
Originally posted by StevenDye
As a 16 year old in sixth form, I really can see how this probably happens alot more than you hear. Alot of teachers are also 'friends' of a sort.
For instance, I have a German in my history class... now he is accepting of it and is used to friendly taunts for being German. (To the point of I simply call him German and he calls me English. Then i tell people his dad is Hitler. It's all jokes.) Now the teacher also knew this having taught him before and made as many German jokes as he could in the first couple of lessons. All fun and games.
Another example, in my form the tutor is a woman, and the amount of sexual innuendo jokes that she gets is amazing . But she simply smiles, or even winks at the student and carries on. Something that the both sides only get away with because the teacher is known more than simply professionally.
I don't find it hard to see that eventually a student/teacher relationship could form. And if both sides really do feel the same way about eachother and know what they are doing, then why is it worng.
Sure you can say that a 16 year old is not as mature as he/she could be. But the same can be said for most things, why not limit cars to 25 year olds? And don't allow people to join the army until they are about 25, so the fully know what they are doing? People have to be given freedom to do what they wish, we shouldn't shield people from making their own mistakes.