The Iranian Mystery Ship: Death from the Sea , page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times


reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 09:26 AM by spines
reply to post by 1011010110



They were even more of a democracy until we (and Britian) decided that them nationalizing thieir oil fields was against our own interests and you know...good for their own people.

And so too Ecuador...

And so too Panama...

And so too, almost, Venezuela...

That's just off the top of my head. Keep all these in mind when you hear anything coming from the mouths of our (US) country, and from our allies who would and have partaken in such operations.



[edit on 10/6/0808 by spines]

[edit on 10/6/0808 by spines]


reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 03:25 PM by ufoorbhunter
reply to post by spines



Iran a democracy? Lol you are trying to be funny? Iran is the main pillar within The Axis of Evil.



reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 04:02 PM by isa75
reply to post by friendforafoe



I thank you so much for your post and putting the real truth out there for us. I hope you stay safe. Thank you for defending our country. Star For You on your response.


reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 06:01 PM by poet1b
reply to post by friendforafoe



Yeah, this place is a hoot. Nice to hang out, and often you get a much better informed class of people here. I always find this stuff fun to speculate on. Take care of yourself over there, one never knows, even where you are, how safe it is.

You should be willing to admit, with our militaries need to know classification of secrets, this ship might be some giant dirty bomb, and you are in a high enough level to hear aboout it. If seems that if this really is the case, that it would be kept very much under wraps, and operations would be as secret as possible.


reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 06:25 PM by Desert Dawg
Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to
post by Desert Dawg



why would they want someone elses `stuff` - it was sailing no where near iran - china netherlands was the route.



There's a possibility that Iran would direct the cargo to another area where it could create many problems.

I note that Ahmadinijad - who seems to be a publicity junky - has been somewhat quiet lately.
Leads me to believe he's up to something.

Dropping an Iranian ship off in an Iranian port would create some interesting reactions from Iran's leaders, would it not?


reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 06:26 PM by poet1b
reply to post by spines



While Mohammed Musaddiq was democratically elected, like all of these third world democratically elected socialists, he went about consolidating power, and most likely would have developed the typical socialistic dictatorship, that Cahavez is currently creating in Venezula. They do a good job of stirring up nationalistic pride, and then create oppresive governments that are worse than the capitalistic system that had been in place, as far as the average person is concerned.

The British and the U.S. developed the oil fields in Iran at considerable investment, it is quite understandable that they weren't going to just walk away from their investment, and let some socalist, spreading nationalistic hatred to further his own interests, take it all over.

While the involvement of the west in the Middle East certainly is questionable, the story is not nearly as lopsided as the liberal elites want to paint it out to be.

While I don't trust the neocons who run the GW regime, I trust the people running Iran even less. There seems to be some fairly strong evidence that there is something very wrong with the cargo of this Iranian ship. I don't buy the argument that this ship is giant dirty bomb, but I could see it shipping this stuff into the area for a better planned assualt against Israel, that would probably come much later.



reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 09:33 PM by poet1b
reply to post by Saf85



Umm, if it was gong to Iran from China, what is it doing off the coast of Somalia? It's only a thousand miles out of the way, in pirate infested waters. Talk about dog $#!^ on a stick.


reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 09:50 PM by Kailassa
reply to post by NOTurTypical
And how does a discussion on Fox about possible causes of symptoms prove that the story you believe is correct?

Sorry, a theoretical analysis of supposed symptoms is not proof anyone in particular has those symptoms.

BTW, you might like to remember the lies repeated when the administration wanted us to be convinced Iraq needed to be invaded.
Right now Bush and Cheney want to establish an excuse to start bombing Iran. Don't help them commit another genocide.


reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 10:09 PM by Saf85
reply to post by poet1b



It is a possibility, Iran planned to switch the cargo at another port, along the original route of the ship, another ship which was destined for Iran could have been the transfere ship, carrying the cargo destined for the Netherlands.

That way the original ship, would have never came near Iran, would have reached the Netherlands with its intended cargo, the radioactive material reaching Iran as planned and never arousing any suspicion on its journey.

Anyway I was just saying, it sounds too much of a coincidence, this happens, then moments later, Israel is calling for Iran to be blockaded.

Does that not seem too convenient for Israeli war plans?


reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 10:21 PM by solomons path
Originally posted by Saf85
Man this article is dog # on a stick!

Yes the ship contains radioactive material, it is not a floating dirty bomb like it is claimed, the shipment is more than likely intended for Irans Enrichment program! Why else would China sell them the stuff if it was intended for a dirty bomb? Do you think China wants to have the blood of millions on its hands and put in the crosshairs for retaliation? Hell no.

Iran probly falsified the intended destination and cargo etc, so it could offload the radioactive shipment in Iran while refuling the ship etc, then load the cover cargo in Iran, ship it to the Netherlands, no one would have been the wiser, but those pirates put a big ass spanner in the works! Ugly dicks, they deserve to die haha.

The Jew media has seized upon this story to twist it to their desires. The story they are making out, is only going to result in a blockade of Iran by the US, this will result in an act of war and Israel will get the US drawn into its dirty plan just like it intends to do!


PLEASE . . . show some sources of this "Jew" media! I have already posted in this thread that is was fasle info, due to the fact that NO Israeli news agency even ran this story!!! Not Haaretz, Jeruselum Post . . . nobody.

Fox News is owned by a German National . . . the U.S. may be using this, as they do the Jewish State, for their gain. However, there is no "Jew" anything running with this. Please don't denagrate the Jewish people by lumping them in with the treasonous U.S. government! Don't fall for the propaganda . . . Isreal would love for the U.S. to stop meddling over there as much as the Iranians do!

Ignorance on your part . . .



reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 11:22 PM by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Kailassa
reply to
post by NOTurTypical
And how does a discussion on Fox about possible causes of symptoms prove that the story you believe is correct?


Did I claim the story was correct? Nice straw man argument dude. I never claimed the Fox link proved the story true. However, the Fox link proved this quote absolutely ignorant at best, or a downright lie at worst:

"Now then, what's missing here?........ Oh Yes!, that's it, a complete lack of any evidence other than innuendo, rumour and completely unsubstantiated reports from anonymous sources."

Secondly, it's not a Fox News STORY, nor is it commentary from a Fox News employee. It's an AP article.


Sorry, a theoretical analysis of supposed symptoms is not proof anyone in particular has those symptoms.


Dead bodies always tell a story. Watch "Forensic Files" sometime.


BTW, you might like to remember the lies repeated when the administration wanted us to be convinced Iraq needed to be invaded.


Oh yeah, I remember, it was a CIA-French Intel-MI6-Mossad-Russian-Saudi-Japanese lie that said Saddam had WMD,

Not to mention Clinton, Gore, Madlin Albright all said Saddam had WMD.

Secondly, Bush didn't need to go to the UN or congress to force Saddam to disarm, the first Gulf War in 1991 was ended by a cease-fire agreement, not a peace treaty. Military operations could have been resumed at the first breach of the cease-fire agreement. I'm not saying Bush is a good, honest man, but I'm not ignorant enough of the international rules of war to think for a second that the resumption of the war wasn't justified under international law.


Right now Bush and Cheney want to establish an excuse to start bombing Iran. Don't help them commit another genocide.


Aww, how cute... are we REALLY gonna focus on the puppets themselves and not those pulling the strings????

Bush and Cheney don't run this nation. The bankers do. Wake up.


reply posted on 6-10-2008 @ 11:24 PM by NOTurTypical
reply to post by solomons path






Fox News is owned by a German National . . . the U.S. may be using this, as they do the Jewish State, for their gain. However, there is no "Jew" anything running with this. Please don't denagrate the Jewish people by lumping them in with the treasonous U.S. government! Don't fall for the propaganda . . . Isreal would love for the U.S. to stop meddling over there as much as the Iranians do!

Ignorance on your part . . .


The ignorance is yours. It's an AP article.

Fox News doesn't = Associated Press
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 14 hours ago, 108 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 9 hours ago, 89 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 12 hours ago, 48 replies