Palin: Obama Is ‘Palling Around With Terrorists’, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 05:41 AM by Areal51
reply to post by jsobecky


Originally posted by jsobecky
"The devil has told you that! The devil has told you that," cried the little man, and in his anger he plunged his right foot so deep into the earth that his whole leg went in, and then in rage he pulled at his left leg so hard with both hands that he tore himself in two.

www.eastoftheweb.com...

There you go again asking for proof. You can't even begin to follow a conversation. For you, a comment just exists on its own, with no relevance to what was said before or after. A prime example of obtuseness.

Your main objective has been to refute what I said, rather than explain your position. You have yet to explain the only position that you have somehow made clear, which is that you don't agree my position. "Why is that?" I have asked over and over again. The only answer I get is from you is "I can't prove a negative. You prove it!" -- which is pure garbage.

And I don't apologize for voicing my contempt of this conversation. Nor do I take your "backing out" as if you care for the integrity of this conversation or this thread.

Your Rumpelstiltskin quote is exactly illustrative of yourself. And I will spell it out for you:

You approached this conversation as if you are right. As if there is a universal truth and that you are in possession of it. However, when it became clear that you were not in possession of such a thing, you viewed your exposure as an attack on your credibility. You then retreated behind a wall of deflection. From behind that wall you launched personal attacks at what you feared; simultaneously hiding yourself and leaving yourself exposed.

Since you were exposed to begin with, you didn't have the courage to say "I don't know" or "I don't have an explanation, it's just what I feel." You just retreated like a coward behind tired old maxims that you do not understand. Maxims that highlighted your sad condition.

See -- you are the one who has torn himself or herself into two. And you sulk off to unconsciously lick your wounds through your delusions. "I'm right, I'm right. I really, really am", you tell yourself.

Have a nice dream, jsobecky.



reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 05:26 PM by GamerGal
reply to post by FlyersFan



No it wasn't. Her husband is freinds with the leader. So unless you can prove that Palin's husband is little more then a voiceless slave who sways her opinion in no way, you lose. Sarah met with them, in her home. Far more recently then Obama worked on a charity board with a college professor who protested an unjust war.



reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 07:14 PM by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by Shocka



"Not even Conservatives have been stupid enough to buy the snake oil that this was a close relationship or even a nefarious one. Of course you know better Governor, you're smarter then the rest of us..."

That was pretty good! I like Olbermann.


reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 07:59 PM by Roper
reply to post by GamerGal


How many bombs did Mr. Palin set off and how many people did he kill?

Roper


reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 08:05 PM by Roper
www.akip.org...

Contrary to initial reports, Vice-President candidate Governor Sarah Palin was never a member of our party. We stand corrected. We issued a press release today. It is posted here to those members of the media who did not receive it.

Todd Palin was registered as a member but never participated in any party activities aside from attending a convention in Wasilla at one time.

Roper


reply posted on 7-10-2008 @ 08:17 PM by GamerGal
reply to post by Roper



So, Palin is friends with terrorists, her husband is a terrorist, but Obama has terrorist friends because he worked on a charity board with a college professor who 40 years ago protested the Vietnam War. Yeah, makes total sense.


reply posted on 8-10-2008 @ 02:19 AM by jsobecky
reply to post by Roper



People here will defend terrorists like William Ayers. Nothing can be said about that, you just have to wonder why they defend terrorists like William Ayers.

Ayers attempted to murder innocent people that had absolutely nothing to do with the Vietnam war. Thank goodness the only thing that saved them was that Ayers was too stupid and inept to do what he set out to do; his incompetence saved their lives.


reply posted on 8-10-2008 @ 04:54 AM by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by jsobecky



I personally was not defending Ayers. I was simply addressing the fact that Roper was alluding to Ayers having set off bombs and killing people, which is not true. Nothing more, nothing less.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^