If it is possible that time had a begining (big bang) its also possible it could have an end. Most theologians would Not want God to come into being
at the beginning of time and cease to exist if it should come to an end.
And this is were Problems start to arise with 'God'
Could the designer have choosen a different universe, or chosen not to make a universe at all? .... if the answer is no, then God had no alternative
but to create this universe and plays no role at all in the explanation - and so does not merit the title 'designer'.
Nature is reduced to a subset of the divine being rather than a creation of this being. in fact this scenario might as well do away with a designer
altogether.
Christians, however, traditionally believe something quite different.
They believe that God created this particular universe as a free act: that is, God was free to not make this universe. but this comes with its own set
of difficulties, because we can ask why it was that God chose to make this universe, as opposed to a lifeless one, or one with maximum suffering.
If the reply is 'it's unfathomable' then the chain of explanation peters out. If the answer is that the choice was blind then again the element of
design is lost, because if the selection was purely whimsical, then the universe is reduced to a divine plaything.
But if the answer is that the decision to make the universe was a profound and considered one which proceeded from God's nature, then one is prompted
to ask about the source of this nature. In other words who designed the designer? making God not god/designer/creator after all..
And this is the problem of God , and even though in current science people agree that the universe looks like it was designed, Any thing you take as
fact from mass organised religions, is probably way off the mark.


