Originally posted by mullet35
reply to post by badmedia
I just dont understand how people change the story to defend the bible where in the bible does it talk about the dinosaurs this is the first life on
earth. besides small bactria and other little tiny creatures dinosaurs where the first life form on earth right, now how about that meteor you just
going to right that off because modern man was not around then so its only lower life form being lost so the bible does not touch on it. Life is life
and all life is supposed to be a creation of god and if that is the case why not give recignition to the loss of it in the bible. The meteor and the
supposed flood that is 2 major events that wiped out the majority of life on this planet but the bible only talks about one of them.
As for the flood go and find aboriginal rock art to prove that it happened they had spirits to explain major events in thier the rainbow serpent made
one of the large rivers for example. If their was an event of this nature on the planet they would have a spirit to explain it. but then if it did
happen they would even be around would they, they weren't on the ark stop having blind faith and just look at the obvious
[edit on 10/6/2008 by mullet35]
The word "dinosaur" wasn't even a word in those days - the word was first used somewhere in the year of 1800.
The Bible does speak of a creature that, from the description, is probably what we now call the "dinosaur". But the words used in the Bible for it
are "Leviathan" and "Behemoth" -
Keep in mind that the Bible doesn't mention domestic cats either.
