It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What is going on with Google Earth? (Related to October 14th)

page: 20
62
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 02:13 AM
link   
Here:

Fourmilab

You can change time/year and look old information. I tried to find year 2006,2007 information but it did not work yesterday (Ok, I had connection problems).

If you can see year 2006 data and there is pentagon, is this case closed???

[edit on 7-10-2008 by hande]

[edit on 7-10-2008 by hande]

[edit on 7-10-2008 by hande]




posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 02:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by Jay-in-AR
If you want to pay out the ass, Google Earth can be quite an awesome program.
My version at the house is the free version, but our version at work is very cool!


If your going to pay for it why use google when you can go to Ikonos?

Here is a sample... (big file warning takes three scans to complete)



woW nice image, tis like seeing mars without a red filter over the lens



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 02:53 AM
link   



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 03:35 AM
link   
reply to post by beyondtopsecret
 


pls go to google earth with weather layer, i dont know why the clouds blocked all over antertica its like a transparent shadow or ...................................?



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 04:26 AM
link   
How is blossom goodchild wrong?

The google pentagon image IS NEW and has not been there before EVER!

I've been using google earth for a really long time and have NEVER seen that pentagon image till now.

The north pole blurry image was always there, so thats no surprise. Also, the pentagon image MOVES, so it's not a glitch. Also, the reason for why the blurry image is at the north pole is because it goes into the inner earth, and they don't want you to know.

NASA and others who give out these satellite images and photos are well known liars and they never tell the truth just like CNN, FoxNews, etc.

She still has a lot of credibility.

People should stop trying to accuse her of lying and being a fraud when they clearly can't comprehend what is going on.

Those types of people are the same ones who are going to get us into a microchipped society as well.

Let's wait till October 14 and judge it for ourselves.

People these days seriously need to OPEN their minds. We really do need intervention because the majority of people in this world are extremely stupid.



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 04:33 AM
link   
reply to post by bobbylove321
 


In fact I don’t believe anything will happen, but I already posted that as a answer in almost al 14-10 threads.

So, if it was to happen? The first question would be, would it been made visible thru media? I strongly think government would do everything to keep it from being broadcasted. Not (only) because they would feel threathed, but they would not want the world to believe there is ANYTHING they can not control.

On the other hand if it is shown to the world, I can not imagine government wouldn’t “sell” it as a combined effort to save the world. Hell, I even bet if they knew for sure and was not able to be avoided this thing was coming, they would probably be in “the air” the 13th to declare their purposes, making the people belive they had everything under control.

It’s the lack of these kind of messages (from government) why I believe nothing will happen, they wouldn’t allow it!

So it’s all a hoax, Blossom will say just before or after the 14th, that the GFL decided not to come because the thought we earthlings were not ready yet. Or the they do/did come but only visible to the believers and not (of course) possible to film or fotograh because of some invisible “veil”.
Or they landed on Mars by mistake leaving them wondering why nobody welcomed them and with their last fuelreserve waisted on the landing they are stuck there!



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 04:44 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 




Good idea, there is one more obvious reason why there are not 2000 mile long ships cloaked sitting above the earth,"SHADOWS" those ships if real would blot out the sun (cloaked or not).There would be huge shadows on earth where day would become night. Think about how shadows are always much larger than the object that cast them.



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 04:54 AM
link   
reply to post by hande
 


I went on and checked out the imagery for both oct 14th 2006 and 2007. There is no octagon...
I'd upload images, but I'm completely new to forums and have no idea how
I'm sure someone else will though.

Not saying there's anything to it...just that it wasn't there before.



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 04:56 AM
link   
reply to post by CaptainMurphy
 


i've done it here

last post on the page...

*edit never mind. i didn't read your post correctly. I dont have those photos uploaded.

You could however upload them to photobucket or something and post the URL here for everyone to see.

Although I'm not sure what those photos would prove?

[edit on 7-10-2008 by seeker11]

[edit on 7-10-2008 by seeker11]



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 07:45 AM
link   
THE ANOMALIES ARE UP ON OTHER IMAGING SITES TOO.
This is from the link that Hande posted.




posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 07:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by nikmti
THE ANOMALIES ARE UP ON OTHER IMAGING SITES TOO.
This is from the link that Hande posted.



It might help to make sure those sites aren't using the same satellite feed. People have already posted images from other satellites that clearly show that there is nothing there.

That's ignorance.



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 08:18 AM
link   
disclose.tv...

I dont know if it is exactly relevant, but it`s interesting....
Unusual cloud formations which `could` resemble space ships



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 10:14 AM
link   
haa haa those recent message pictures look really like "snow cone". And there is even snow on top!



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 10:20 AM
link   



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 10:25 AM
link   
I know this has been mentioned in another thread because I tried to check a link in it but it did not work. I have no idea what date it was that Blossom posted her latest channeling but I know she was given the word diamond or something like that. I don't know if the channeling or this thread came first but someone definitely needs to find out. To me, this google earth image looks very much like a diamond and is definitely big and ship-like. Someone mentioned that this might cause interference with air traffic? I'm not entirely sure but I don't think that the north pole sees a lot of anything, much less air traffic.



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 10:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by tarifa37
"SHADOWS" those ships if real would blot out the sun (cloaked or not).There would be huge shadows on earth where day would become night.


err no... not necessarily... not if the 'cloaking' is done in a way that the light from behind 'bends' around the object and continues on its original path...

Image as an example fiber optics... light goes in one end of a tube, bend it where you want and it comes out the other end... principle is similar...

but if I told you more I would have to shoot you



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 10:54 AM
link   
"she was given the word diamond or something like that."

One you-tube video tells the mystery word was "Snow cone". I am not sure that was what Blossom said..



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 10:58 AM
link   
Well put 2 and 2 together. Diamond + Snow Cone= Weird Diamond shape over Snowy and cold Arctic.



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 10:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by edgecrusher2199 I'm not entirely sure but I don't think that the north pole sees a lot of anything, much less air traffic.


International Flights to Europe go west to east, but return over polar routes



posted on Oct, 7 2008 @ 12:23 PM
link   
Geostationary weather satellites are very far up - 22,223 miles above earth.

Airplanes, to the best of my knowledge, are more on the order of 5 miles up.

So, it is still possible to park a large "diamond" shaped object somewhere between the planes and the satellites!!

Now, what gives? If this is a glitch with GE, answer the following:

1) Why not the same "mapping" problems on the south pole?

2) Move the GE height out to 22,223 miles up for an idea of the satellites view - tell me, how do they miss the shot from up there?

3) Why is the shape non-uniform? This is not a pentagon of equal lengths - which might have indicated some type of 2D to 3D mapping issue. In fact, if you look at the "rear" (if that is the rear) there seem to be two small indents adjacent to the rear.

PS: Also, using "nautical miles" (instead of miles to measure the size, you get almost exactly 2000 nautical miles.

Still very curious, and hopeful.....




top topics



 
62
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join