It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Survival Of The Fittest-The Truth.

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 3 2008 @ 06:31 PM
link   
One of the biggest myths in Evolution is;survival of the fittest.

Creationists and Evolutionist alike believe that such an idea came from Darwin,that it meant only the strong survive,and that Darwin applied it to the social world.



The phrase was 1st coined by the English philosopher,Herbert Spencer after he had read Darwin's Origin of Species and noticed the similarity with the natural selection theory.

Darwin,after reading Spencer's Principles of Biology,started to use the phrase along side his own in later publications of the Origin of Species.Of it he said;

I have called this principle,by which each slight variation,if useful,is preserved,by the term natural selection,in order to mark its relation to man's power of selection.But the expression often used by Mr.Herbert Spencer,of the Survival of the Fittest,is more accurate,and is sometimes equally convenient.
What is important to note is that Darwin viewed the word 'fittest' not in relation to the strongest,but in relation to that which was most suitable in adapting to the enviroment.


(It should also be noted that the survival of the fittest view is not consistent with the Theory of Evolution.Any organism which is capable of reproducing itself on an ongoing basis will survive as a species.)




It was Spencer who,from his own theory,came up with what we know as Social Darwinism.He created the model that applied the law of the survival of the fittest to society.Humanitarian impulses had to be resisted as nothing should be allowed to interfere with nature's laws,including the social struggle for existence.

He believed that over the course of many generations the evolutionary process would ensure that human beings would become less aggressive and increasingly altruistic,leading eventually to a perfect society in which no one would cause another person pain.Anything that interfered with the 'natural' relationship of conduct and consequence was to be resisted and this included the use of the coercive power of the state to relieve poverty,to provide public education,or to require compulsory vaccination etc.




Such a view is not compatible with Darwin's natural selection which is a open-ended process of change based on random variations that prospered or failed depending on their adaptation to environmental conditions.



The mistakes in the origin of this theory lead many to blame the Theory of Evolution for undermining moral standards and for giving the "strongest" a just excuse for taking/doing what they want.









[edit on 3-10-2008 by jakyll]




posted on Oct, 3 2008 @ 07:03 PM
link   
This is really good. Do you wanna put it in my Evolution Misconceptions thread? It'd be useful there



posted on Oct, 3 2008 @ 07:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Good Wolf
 


Feel free to add it as a link.

I starred and flagged your thread a few days ago.


[edit on 3-10-2008 by jakyll]



posted on Oct, 6 2008 @ 03:17 AM
link   
Survival of the fittest is not applying to a species as a whole, its referring to the members of such a species, some having more desirable and useful traits over others, and therefore are more likely to survive, whereas the other might die, due to lacking these traits. Its not saying a whole species will die.



posted on Oct, 6 2008 @ 05:38 AM
link   
no it's refferent to individual organisms and their competition with those around it, regardless of species.



new topics

top topics
 
2

log in

join