Is Blossom Goodchild Right about Oct 14th? Is This proof?

reply to post by IronMan

---

Wow your REALLY sarcastic lol.

Or maybe your serious?

I think the whole point of this could be to crush the philosophy which we currently live by. I don't think that the whole possible "staged" invasion is to necessarily be worshiped, rather, to introduce a new frame of mind for the general population.

If you look at New Age religious philosophy (ie: Alice A. Bailey - which, from what I understand, if VERY big in the UN for the future of religion), it deals with a whole new outlook on how we see ourselves in reference to our past/future, and new outlook on death, gods, and humanity in general. I feel as if the whole purpose is to crush our current, and according the Bailey "outdated" view on the world. The goal is to bring in the 'new', whilst pushing out the old and tired.

I'm certainly not claiming to know all the answers, just my own point of view.

Cheers!

I hear a lot about the 7th, but I have no idea what it's referring to. Care to clue me in?

Only thing to do is to wait till the 14th. Those people that witnessed this even carry cell phones without digital cameras, and did not have a camera with them.
Maybe these aliens or whom ever that will come will play "The Final Countdown" on giant speakers as their ship is landing, maybe they are landing in Europe?.

where is the source that says goodchilds channeler mentioned snow cone.??? I have read her channeled message.. there is no mention of snow cone...

reply to post by Truther

---

I don't get it. Blossom has channeled ET. What is that, like telepathy. Can she communicate with them, or is it more like clairvoyance.
It's my understanding from readings, they kinda float in and out. No power shows. Kinda like they are doing in the UK now or they did in the US last year, with a big finale in Stephenville.

If anything, I would suspect, that ET would possibly put on a big show in the UK, if they show. People in the UK get your cameras ready. Sometimes, with clairvoyance, you have the time right, but the place is fuzzy Or you have the event, but the place and time are confused.

Right near the bottom of the page, note 'snow cone'

looks more like a slice of sky pizza, to me...

this is proof of absolutely. nothing.

10/14 will come and go just as any other day has.

---

a phenomena as described would have been seen by countless others for miles and miles around.

where are the reports?

florida is very flat, holly hill is very well populated complete with a nearby international airport, with lots and lots of people looking at the sky.

you'd think there would be massive reports flooding the news outlets and emergency services, yet.... nary a peep?

Holly Hill, FL

Wow, I mean all the cellphones out there with cameras and you are excited by an artists rendering that looks like a photoshop job.

Goodchilde sounds like a modern day new age hippie that proly see UFOs on a daily basis.

Sorry... it was just a shadow

oregonskywatch.com...

Remember the TIP to the solution of mystery cone: about an hour before sunset

[edit on 3/10/08 by blackcube]

I live in Alabama, so if something were to happen, and happen here, well I'd be pleased.

BUT.. this "proof" isn't really proof. If you make a prediction, but don't say when it will happen or give specific details, then that's not a prediction that can be verified.

As for the possible theories on what happened in the Florida sky, just because there is no immediate explanation doesn't mean it isn't a natural phenomenon. The video says its "unlikely", but there's no reason given that it would be "unlikely".

Now that said, her prediction of a visit from aliens on October 14th is certainly one that can be tested, and we will see for sure.

As much as I hate to say it, this is not proof, or really even evidence.

are you saying rectangular rain fell from the sky?
as in long, square concerned rain drops?

So now we have "snow cone", then "table" and the latest is now "Diamonds".

So I am going to stretch here..........(some speculation from her website)

Snow Cone = mountain shape(snow caps)
Table = Mountains in Africa (table mountain nat'l pk)
Diamonds = Diamond mines in africa also

So they are going to show up at the Table Mountains in Africa ?

New Age religious philosophy is not really different than the philosophy of Jesus. Only in image for the most part.

Jesus offers all the things you mention, they are just not followed or allowed to be understood.

For example, New Age will say everything is connected right? That god is consciousness, and that in the end we are just 1 being. But that is exactly was Jesus said.

John 14:20 - At that time you will know that I am in my Father, that you are in me, and that I am in you.

When I first realized and understood the above, I didn't even think about the bible or anything it said. I came to understand that, and it would be considered to be New Age. I had no idea it was in the bible. But then I seen that quote, and for the first time I actually understood what it was saying. I'd seen it before, but I didn't understand.

Thus comes - judge not, yest you be judged. Because when you judge, you are judging yourself.

Revelations is often viewed as death and destruction. But what does revelation really mean?

# disclosure: the speech act of making something evident
# an enlightening or astonishing disclosure
# communication of knowledge to man by a divine or supernatural agency

I often tell my new age friends they are Christians and don't even know it. But it doesn't really matter if they use the image of Jesus, it's the philosophy and understanding that actually matters, which is why I say that.

I certainly agree with you. Only problem with Christianity is that they don't believe in the idea that when you judge, you are judging yourself. They don't seem to consider we are all as one. They are more inclined, like most of us, to think of ME first, whereas, New Age seems to discuss US first. In order to cross the bridge from me-only, to us-only, we need this 'revelation'/'enlightenment'. While Christianity certainly may be the model, I see New Age as the more "recent" version of it. New Age seems set on getting rid of the old, irrelevant stuff, and bringing in something more "new".

If you were part of the "NWO" and were set on one world religion, you would certainly need :
# disclosure: the speech act of making something evident
# an enlightening or astonishing disclosure
# communication of knowledge to man by a divine or supernatural agency.

What better than a staged alien show? People can go "ungodly" and want to fear it. To somehow try and fight. To have mayhem in the streets. To try and save yourself. New Age tries to have the belief of willingness to do what is best for the human race, not for yourself. It's all about love in New Age, not fear. When I see this Blossom Goodchild stuff, all I hear is New Age, and a test of mans beliefs.

Population control/reduction is supposed to be part of the NWO. However, no one would ever want to submit to their own death and acceptance of population reduction. But if they all bought in to this New Age style, you'd be happy to get rid of yourself for the benefit of humanity.

Just a few thoughts of mine.

reply to post by tenfly

---

HI Tenfly, the Oct 7 reference is to what was referred to as a "web bot" prediction. Here's the link: www.abovetopsecret.com...'

the wealth of ignorance about christianity on this forum is truly impressive.

keep those stereotypes alive, mateys... its really all you have.

All this fries my bisquits. I'm with you, nobody anywhere knows anything.

I suppose you saw something like this image

farm2.static.flickr.com...

High contrails can also shadow the clouds, making them darker and blending with the sky, like this

images.google.com...://contrailscience.com/images/image003639.jpg&imgrefurl=http://contrailscience.com/contrails-dark-lines-che mtrails/&h=533&w=800&sz=54&hl=en&start=27&usg=__9YWs3X9hhkBnJLHN9pvvIeNvJJA=&tbnid=jv9skbqUaBkx4M:&tbnh=95&tbnw=143&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsky%2Bshadow%2B through%2Bclouds%26start%3D18%26gbv%3D2%26ndsp%3D18%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-USfficial%26sa%3DN

That, however, is not required to validate her claims. Her claims will be validated or not on Oct 14. If not validated, she will stand in line with the thousands of false prophets that have plagued us over the past. In Moses time, they killed them for that. See Deu 18.

Let's say she's right. How does it fit into the Biblical prophecies and scientific evidences and forecasts?

The end times will have 7 years of tribulation, in the middle of which there will be something that changes things a lot. Hopefully, we won't be here for the bad part. Look at the timeline:

Her spacecraft docks on Oct 14, 2008. They will be considered "sons of God" because they (1) came from heaven, or space and (2) have power over us for life or death - the definition of god in the Old Testament (not to be confused with God, with the BIG G). Judges in the OT executed the laws and punishments of God, so they were referred to as gods (even Jesus said so). If this is the case, then these sons of God will make bring back conditions like in the days of Noah. See Genesis 6:1-2. These preconditions lead to the violence, and the return of Christ.

3 1/2 years from the Oct 14 date we are entering into dates around May 20, 2012 - the first solar eclipse of the year (visible in California, too). Followed by a partial lunar eclipse on Jun 4. Again, both eclipses happen in Nov 2012.
This would fulfill "the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall be as blood" in sequence (Acts 2:20). These would conveniently be mid-term before the eventual date of 21-21-2012. The second 3 1/2 years the faithful will be raptured, hopefully. Who knows.

This stuff is rather ambiguous, just thought I would throw out some ideas on timelines. Not an exact science. Sorry.