Rep Brad Sherman threatened with Martial Law (not Congress type), page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times
Topic started on 2-10-2008 @ 09:26 PM by redhatty
From C-Span earlier today www.c-spanarchives.org...

Brad Sherman says:

"We were told in private conversations . . . . (then mentions the stock market falling) & then:

"and some of us have been told that if we don't pass this bill there might even be martial law if the stock market drops a couple thousand points.."

He was saying that Paulson is pulling the strings. That this is all about paying foreign investors who are demanding money. Mostly Saudi and China. He said this is bill is a hostage situation. He said the President was asking for this bill to be pass UNDER DURESS. He said Paulson wants the money NOW even though he is leaving office in Jan. AND, WHY would he want that? Cause he intends to use it to pay off foreign investors.

He used strong language.

Hostage
Duress
Panic
Martial Law

he was NOT referring to House martial law this time.
He was referring to the threat of OUR martial law.
He was very very clear.
He was sending a message to the American people.
WE ARE IN TROUBLE HERE


reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 09:48 PM by redhatty
reply to post by maudeeb



I had to use Internet Explorer to view it, Firefox wouldn't connect, then again, the debate were on too, so it may have been server overload.

Try this link in IE

CSPAN

[edit on 10/2/08 by redhatty]


reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 10:33 PM by maudeeb
reply to post by redhatty



Just watched it. A few points to sanity check -

1. His statements about what some were told are in reference to the impending vote last monday.

2. His comment on martial law and thousands of point drops were not made to imply those were forseeable realities, but to emphasize how the administration was using "scare tactics" (his own characterization) to push the bill through.

Not that this shouldn't be on the radar, but let's be clear that it wasn't a message to anybody that those things could happen, it was an account of how the administration was blowing things out of proportion to scare reps into voting for the bill. That's something we alll know the admin. is VERY good at.


reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 10:40 PM by Anonymous ATS
1) Here's a "cspanvideolink" copied from a similar thread on the latoc board

www.c-spanarchives.org...

2) this"martial law" reference was in reference to the first house voteof the bail out bill bill failed it didn't happen. Taken in context, the comment was used to add a sense of urgency to the first bill.odon'tgoloadingmagazinesyet. Vote extortion? possibly; outright fabrication also a possibility...so don't go loading magazines yet...


reply posted on 2-10-2008 @ 10:42 PM by DancedWithWolves
Folks,

If you haven't read this
thread I would highly recommend it. The analysis of the bailout conspiracy goes right along with these warnings with the same players....

Ummmm.........



reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 12:29 AM by cornblossom
reply to post by redhatty


Thanks so much for bringing this to our attention. Sherman makes it very clear what's going on, and I wish our mainstream media would be getting information like this...the truth...out to the public.


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 12:36 AM by redhatty
reply to post by anachryon



Thank you, I was just about to add that

This was today folks! Yes, he was saying that people were told that if this bill didn't pass on Monday there would be Martial Law in America.

It hasn't happened YET, but at least we have ONE MAN telling us what they have planned.


reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 01:35 AM by 1011010110
Rep Kaptur says there are domestic enemies within Congress
www.youtube.com...

Stop making excuses for the white house and congress. We're at war. This isn't a war of guns and bombs. It's a war of veiled threats. Paulson, Bernanke, and Bush are guilty of economic terrorism, where they threaten the markets will fall, unemployment will rise, and we'll enter recession if we don't do what they tell us. That's the very definition of terrorism as defined by the patriot act. By their own laws, they should be put in gitmo indefinitely, but they aren't because the people who are suppose to enforce the law aren't afraid of the people. They're more afraid of foreign bankers who didn't get their money from toxic mortgages.



reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 07:12 PM by invisiblewoman
reply to post by cpdaman



The Saudis along with the Bush administration orchestrated this outcome ,it is a mess they made to make this grab The Chinese too but I think it has a different, trail of association with them, maybe not
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Fox News Drops The Ball On Its Focus Group - Ron Paul Supporters!
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
Obama Supporters...Remember This List When You Vote This Year.
  Posted 13 days ago with 35 member flags
26 Things Non-Paul Voters Are Basically Saying
  Posted 5 days ago with 27 member flags
What\'s With The Obama Love on ATS Today?
  Posted 16 days ago with 25 member flags
Obama and why he\'ll still be president...
  Posted 18 days ago with 24 member flags