It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Did ATS exist in 1969

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 01:22 AM
link   
Yes I want to know the answer, because, while I was browsing through the profile of some memebers and came across a profile of a member named johnlear, I get the information that he registered on December 31, 1969, and even is name his not visible in the avatar region and only in the members region.

See for yourself,

www.abovetopsecret.com...

So, ats is nearly 40 years old.


[edit on 2/10/08 by peacejet]

[edit on 2/10/08 by peacejet]




posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 01:38 AM
link   
I dont know but my guess would be a Test Profile?
Otherwise its kinda strange.

Its also to do with Dulce.
Google it and you will be enlightened.


[edit on 2-10-2008 by SvenTheBerserK]



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 01:40 AM
link   
reply to post by SvenTheBerserK
 


I dont think it is a test profile, ats has its own information account profile, then why should they test on a new profile.



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 01:41 AM
link   
AL Gore existed at that time, but I am pretty sure he was heavy into the reefer and not technology.



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 01:50 AM
link   
This is from Project Camelot




K: Okay, I know you, you’ve been banned. That’s the extent of it, and we don’t actually know why. What we know about it is that, or what we think we know is that it’s a CIA front and managed by the CIA, so if you’ve been banned, it might be that you’re getting too hot. J: That’s what I think, and when I first joined ATS, maybe three years ago, I thought, you know what, this is just a collection point for what people think is going on. So that THEY KNOW what the general public thinks is going on and they have a bunch of debunkers there that are, you know, paid to go in there and somebody talks about something and they say “oh, no, no, here’s what really going on.” You know...


Interview with John Lear

Is it starting to add up yet?

[edit on 2-10-2008 by SvenTheBerserK]



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 02:18 AM
link   
reply to post by SvenTheBerserK
 


Excuse me that interview was this year and he joined ats three years ago that makes it 2005 and this johnlear seems to be different from our john lear.



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 02:27 AM
link   



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 02:34 AM
link   
How does he seem different? theres nothing in his profile.
The john im talking about seems like the logical choice.



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 02:38 AM
link   
CIA snoop shop shhhh whisper it...

SO isn't awake yet. but when he does RUN ......>>>>>>>>.

my dunce hat is proof

[edit on 2/10/08 by ROO-meh]



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 02:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by SvenTheBerserK
This is from Project Camelot



Thanks Sven, and I am sure anyone who is entrusted with power to fairly run a website that proclaims "Deny Ignorance" would not object to everyone on ATS making up their own minds. right? RIGHT?!



[edit on 2-10-2008 by ATS4dummies]



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 02:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by SvenTheBerserK
How does he seem different? theres nothing in his profile.
The john im talking about seems like the logical choice.


Its all in the name, the person you are mentioning is John Lear and he is johnlear, a small but absolute evidence, and even if he was banned, his threads should have been visible.



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 02:41 AM
link   
I agree with a anonymous poster that some mods might have changed the data in the SQL server.



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 02:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by peacejet
I agree with a anonymous poster that some mods might have changed the data in the SQL server.


I cant see that post but thats what i was starting to think.
I dont know who to trust anymore. lol



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 02:55 AM
link   
reply to post by SvenTheBerserK
 


Even I couldnt see that in the main page, but when you are typing the reply and you scroll down the page to view the replies for verification you can see that post



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 02:57 AM
link   
Well considering BBS's were all the rage decades after the advent of the internet, I doubt ATS was fully operational in 69



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 02:58 AM
link   
Ah ok i see now lol thanks.
Are we able to get a mod to explain...save us guessing?

[edit on 2-10-2008 by SvenTheBerserK]



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 03:04 AM
link   
reply to post by SvenTheBerserK
 


I dont think the moderators have the powers to remove the entire profile, lets see what action does a mod take.



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 03:08 AM
link   
reply to post by peacejet
 


Oh, btw...

Nice catch


1969 was the first time we faked a moon landing, maybe it has something to do with that?



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 03:10 AM
link   
Hmm, I would say that NASA didnt fake the moon landing and it was real, based on the photographic evidence which was impossible to fake at that time



posted on Oct, 2 2008 @ 04:07 AM
link   
reply to post by peacejet
 


I am not saying they didn't photograph stuff




top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join