posted on Oct, 1 2008 @ 03:35 PM
LaRouche has managed to attract a small, but fanatical following to his conspiratorial view of the world. (Ed Note : Read: Jones) Despite their small
numbers (estimated at from one to three thousand), he has managed to fashion them into a surprisingly broad network of organizations that not only
extend to many many major cities in the U.S., but to Europe and Latin America as well.
All of the groups adhere to LaRouches ideology, which holds that a "super elite", which he calls the "Oligarchy", controls world events.
Included in the oligarchy are such disparate elements as the Rockefeller family, the British Royal family, the Jewish Anti-Defamation League, the
Soviet KGB, National Review, and the Heritage Foundation.
The use of various fronts has been among the LaRouche network's most successful tactics (Ed Note : Read "We are change, 911 Truth, etc."),
enabling it to atttract unwitting, well-intentioned citizens to it's cause. Obviously laRouche learned well from his Masonic research, for he uses
What puzzles most casual observers of the LaRouche operation is just what it is that the organization really stands for, and what it is that it
wants. Depending on the moment and the issue, LaRouche can appear to be ultra right wing, ultra left wing, or somewhere in between. There are,
however, certain themes that run consistently through the ideology of his network. Among them, so say his accusers, is virulent anti-semitism.
However, many in the LaRouche network are Jewish, such as Anton Chaitkin, author of Treason in America; Richard Dreyfuss; author of Hostage to
Khomeini; and David Goldman and Jeffrey Steinberg, co authors of "Dope Inc."
Dr. John Coleman, an anti-Masonic conspiracy researcher and former British Intelligence officer, says, in a letter dated Sept. / Oct, 1986, that
LaRouche's publication New Solidarity, is funded by the KGB. So also believes the Heritige Foudation. Coleman adds that New Solidarity "is run by
Jews and should be called Jew Solidarity".
In an attempt to make some sense of these allegations, zI spent many telephone hours with the LaRouche network from 1982 ot 1986. In conversation
with a particular LaRouche solicitor, who, incidently, was Jewish, I asked, "Why is LaRouche slandered by the Anti-Defamation League as anti-semetic,
when so many of you are Jews?" the female solicitor answered, "There are different kinds of Jews." I then asked, "Is LaRouche anti-semetic or
not?" She answered, "No, we are anti-Zionist." My final question was, "Is LaRouche Jewish?" She answered, "No".
In another conversation with a LaRouche solicitor from Washington, D.C., headquarters, I asked Do you realize there are two Freemasonries? LaRouche
only condemns the British form." The solicitor answered, "There are bad Masons and good Masons." I asked, "Who are the good Masons?" The
solicitor answered, "People like Ben Franklin and George Washington".
Realizing that both Franklin and Washington were backed by French Freemasonry, I suspected LaRouche was as well. My final question was, "Is
LaRouche a Grand Orient Freemason?", and the solicitor answered, "Yes".
My conclusion is that LaRouche is backed, not by the KGB, but by the Communistic French Grand Orient Lodge. When he made his extended trip to
Europe, he must have joined the Grand Orient. His Jewish contingency are Reform Jews, who from their inception have been teied to Grand Orient Masons.
Apparanetly, LaRouche's assignment is to bring down America with a Communist Revolution.
Why then, do I use some of his publications and documentation for my book?