Originally posted by Camilo1
Show me ONE polititian in the entire world that deep down doesn´t want to be a dictator, politics is a very frustrating game, and that is what he is
trying to say.
Your thread title is misleading and taking words out of context is very easy.
Elections should be run completely differently.
The people running should be the only people in the country who don't want to run.. lol
The most qualified person who doesn't want to run for president. lol
I mean.. isn't that the way the rest of the world works? most people I know work in a position they don't want to, and they usually do all the work
they're supposed to AND AND AND they usually they do the job everyone expects of them, sure it might be half-aced but still it gets done the way the
PEOPLE want.. lol
I find it scary that he even used the word dictator.
That word is soooooo semantically charged .. he might as well have said predator.
So let me get this straight.. (for those who don't think this is a big deal, because of the context)...
If I were to run for dictatorship, and planned on being successful I should lead with my wide-spread agreeable ideas first? ..
Like, if I were dictator than I'd make sure everyone would have free health-care, a 3 day weekend, free booze on sundays and free food fridays where
you can get as much as you yourself can carry (one entry per-store per-person)....
How does one justify being a dictator, or using that word to express the job of a president or prime minister? What situation or context makes this
appropriate to brush of as something we tolerate, I for one think we need people with way more sense than that to be president, or prime minister.